Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881657›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

SP rTaTME: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (SP rTaTME).

J H Marks, J F Salem, P Adams, T Sun, E Kunkel, H Schoonyoung, S Agarwal

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J H MarksLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA. marksj@mlhs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-0603
J F SalemLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
P AdamsLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
T SunLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
E KunkelLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
H SchoonyoungLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
S AgarwalLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Lankenau Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe technical difficulty and steep learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has limited widespread adoption. The single-port (SP) daVinci robot is designed to facilitate single-incision and natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This paper describes the first clinical experience of single-port robotic taTME (SP rTaTME).

methodsThis was a prospective study on consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent SP rTaTME proctosigmoidectomy with handsewn coloanal anastomosis in December 2018 and January 2019. The primary outcome was technical feasibility of the procedure. The secondary outcomes include blood loss, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, quality of the TME specimen, short- and long-term morbidity and mortality, as well as short-term oncologic follow -up.

resultsThere were two patients, a 48-year-old male and a 38-year-old female. Both operations were completed successfully without complications or conversion. Estimated blood loss was 200 mL and 130 mL. In both cases the TME was completed transanally using the SP robot. In the first patient, the abdominal portion was completed through an abdominal single-incision; in the second patient the operation was entirely performed transanally as a pure NOTES procedure. In both cases, the final pathology report showed a complete TME with negative margins. Patients were discharged on postoperative day 3 and 4,respectively. There was no long-term morbidity or mortality.

conclusionsSP rTaTME is feasible and can be safely performed. It provides excellent optics and dexterity to work in a limited space. Future studies are required to further define the safety profile and the ultimate utility of the SP robot for taTME.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectumMinimally invasive surgery (mis)Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)Robotic surgerySingle-port robot (SPr)Transanal surgeryTransanal total mesorectal excision (taTME)

Identifiers

PMID33881657
OpenAlexW3154212532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.