Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881603›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Readmissions and perioperative outcomes for same-day versus next-day discharge after prolapse surgery.

Elizabeth H Robison, Pamela E Smith, Lopa K Pandya, Silpa Nekkanti, Andrew F Hundley, Catherine O Hudson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harmful incidents following gynaecological ambulatory surgery: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth H RobisonDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Elizabeth.robison@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-7941
Pamela E SmithDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Lopa K PandyaDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Silpa NekkantiDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Andrew F HundleyDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Catherine O HudsonDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Floor 5, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe aimed to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) compared with next-day discharge (NDD) after prolapse surgery on a national level hypothesizing that readmission and complication rates after SDD would not be higher than NDD.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database including 2014-2018. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify minimally invasive apical suspensions or obliterative procedures. Exclusion criteria were length of stay > 1 day, unrelated concomitant procedures, serious medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class >2, and complication during index admission. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission, and secondary outcomes included 30-day complications.

results12,583 were included in analysis. SDD rate was 16.7%. The majority of women were white (91%) with a mean age of 59 years and mean body mass index of 28 kg/m². Medical comorbidities were similar between the SDD and NDD groups. Overall incidence of 30-day readmission was 1.7%. SDD had lower odds of 30-day readmission than NDD (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). SDD had lower odds of 30-day complications but this failed to reach statistical significance (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03).

conclusionsIn this cohort, 30-day readmission and complication rates were not higher after SDD compared to NDD in women undergoing minimally-invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures. We interpret these findings carefully given study limitations but believe our findings support the safety of SDD after minimally invasive apical suspension or obliterative procedures in a low-risk population.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesPelvic reconstructive surgeryPostoperative complicationsProlapse surgeryReadmissionSame-day discharge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.