Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881552›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Establishing evidence-based prevention and health promotion: criteria for evidence-based interventions and necessary organizational requirements and capacities].

Freia De Bock, Eva Rehfuess

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Freia De BockAbteilung 2 "Effektivität und Effizienz gesundheitliche Aufklärung", Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Deutschland. freia.debock@bzga.de.
Eva RehfuessInstitut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Prevention Act underlines the need for an evidence-based approach to prevention and health promotion. It is unclear which steps and processes are necessary for the evolving system of prevention and health promotion in Germany to meet this requirement. This overview article aims to define and operationalize evidence-based interventions in prevention and health promotion and describes the necessary organizational support and capacity building to foster evidence-based action in practice.Based on the international scientific literature and the Federal Centre for Health Education's Memorandum on Evidence-based Prevention and Health Promotion, the term evidence-based intervention is defined and operationalized, and implementation requirements in terms of organizational processes and capacity building are described and discussed.To foster implementation of evidence-based action in practice, decision makers in policy and practice should draw on a shared understanding of the concept of evidence-based interventions and of the need for evaluations that assure generating evidence while implementing interventions. Moreover, organizational support is necessary, such as emphasizing the value of evidence-based action within organizations, ensuring access to existing evidence databases with a transparent and relevant presentation of evidence, advancing competencies of the workforce in searching for and interpreting evidence syntheses, as well as promoting a systematic cooperation between practitioners and researchers.Implementing the above-described elements for more evidence-based action is an important step towards strengthening the evolving system of prevention and health promotion as a fifth pillar of the German health system.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingHealth PromotionEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyGovernment ProgramsCapacity buildingComplex interventionsEffectivenessPracticeSystems perspective

Identifiers

PMID33881552
PMCPMC8087549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.