Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881449›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2021

Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Early Discrimination of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Thomas E Kaier, Michael Marber, Vincent Gysin, Luca Koechlin, Ana Yufera Sanchez, Maria Rubini Giménez, Desiree Wussler and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI in atrial fibrillation: insights from the HERA-FIB registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Thomas NestelbergerCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jasper BoeddinghausCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pedro Lopez-AyalaCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas E KaierKing's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michael MarberKing's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Vincent GysinCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Luca KoechlinCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ana Yufera SanchezCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Maria Rubini GiménezCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Desiree WusslerCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joan Elias WalterCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ivo StrebelCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias ZimmermannCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Noemi GlarnerCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Òscar MiróGREAT Network, Rome, Italy.
F Javier Martin-SanchezGREAT Network, Rome, Italy.
Tatjana ZehnderCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Raphael TwerenboldCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dagmar I KellerEmergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian MuellerCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
APACE Investigators
University of Basel · CHSt Thomas' Hospital · GBHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/13/31320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Rapid and accurate noninvasive discrimination of type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI), which is because of a supply-demand mismatch, from type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), which arises via plaque rupture, is essential, because treatment differs substantially. Unfortunately, this is a major unmet clinical need, because even high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measurement provides only modest accuracy. Objective: To test the hypothesis that novel cardiovascular biomarkers quantifying different pathophysiological pathways involved in T2MI and/or T1MI may aid physicians in the rapid discrimination of T2MI vs T1MI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter prospective diagnostic study was conducted in 12 emergency departments in 5 countries (Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Poland, and the Czech Republic) with patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency departments. The study quantified the discrimination of hs-cTn T, hs-cTn I, and 17 novel cardiovascular biomarkers measured in subsets of consecutively enrolled patients against a reference standard (final diagnosis), centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists according to the fourth universal definition of MI, using all information, including cardiac imaging and serial measurements of hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI. Results: Among 5887 patients, 1106 (18.8%) had an adjudicated final diagnosis of MI; of these, 860 patients (77.8%) had T1MI, and 246 patients (22.2%) had T2MI. Patients with T2MI vs those with T1MI had lower concentrations of biomarkers quantifying cardiomyocyte injury hs-cTnT (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 30 (17-55) ng/L vs 58 (28-150) ng/L), hs-cTnI (median [IQR], 23 [10-83] ng/L vs 115 [28-576] ng/L; P < .001), and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (at presentation: median [IQR], 76 [38-189] ng/L vs 257 [75-876] ng/L; P < .001) but higher concentrations of biomarkers quantifying endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, and/or hemodynamic stress (median [IQR] values: C-terminal proendothelin 1, 97 [75-134] pmol/L vs 68 [55-91] pmol/L; midregional proadrenomedullin, 0.97 [0.67-1.51] pmol/L vs 0.72 [0.53-0.99] pmol/L; midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide, 378 [207-491] pmol/L vs 152 [90-247] pmol/L; and growth differentiation factor 15, 2.26 [1.44-4.35] vs 1.56 [1.02-2.19] ng/L; all P < .001). Discrimination for these biomarkers, as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, was modest (hs-cTnT, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.64-0.71]; hs-cTn I, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67-0.74]; cardiac myosin-binding protein C, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61-0.73]; C-terminal proendothelin 1, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.83]; midregional proadrenomedullin, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.60-0.73]; midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68-0.87]; and growth differentiation factor 15, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58-0.79]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, biomarkers quantifying myocardial injury, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, and/or hemodynamic stress provided modest discrimination in early, noninvasive diagnosis of T2MI.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticProspective StudiesRupture, SpontaneousTroponin ITroponin TBiomarkersTroponin ITroponin T

Identifiers

PMID33881449
PMCPMC8060883
OpenAlexW3155945277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.