ArticleJAMA cardiology2021
Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Early Discrimination of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of biomarkers in patients with a type 2 myocardial infarction: a systematic review.Open heart · 2026Pooled it
- Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI in atrial fibrillation: insights from the HERA-FIB registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Observational
- Contemporary Challenges and Strategies for Diagnosing and Managing in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Differentiating Type 1 and Type 2 myocardial infarction using a machine learning algorithm and biomarkers.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Type 2 myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis and treatment.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Narrative Review through Decisional Crossroads.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Differential gene expression patterns in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characteristics and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Through Worsening Renal Function and NT-proBNP in Older Adults with Pneumonia.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- Chest Pain in Cancer Patients: Prevalence of Myocardial Infarction and Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins.JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Article
- Association of accompanying dyspnoea with diagnosis and outcome of patients presenting with acute chest discomfort.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2023Article
- Potential Biomarkers to Distinguish Type 1 Myocardial Infarction in Troponin-Elevated Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Distinguishing Type 1 from Type 2 Myocardial Infarction by Using CT Coronary Angiography.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- Serial measurements of protein and microRNA biomarkers to specify myocardial infarction subtypes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2022Article
- Clinical and prognostic implications of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations in type 2 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Adding stress biomarkers to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for rapid non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rule-out protocols.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Article
- L-Carnitine Alleviates the Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Remodeling through Bax/Bcl-2 Signal Pathway.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Rapid and accurate noninvasive discrimination of type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI), which is because of a supply-demand mismatch, from type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), which arises via plaque rupture, is essential, because treatment differs substantially. Unfortunately, this is a major unmet clinical need, because even high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measurement provides only modest accuracy. Objective: To test the hypothesis that novel cardiovascular biomarkers quantifying different pathophysiological pathways involved in T2MI and/or T1MI may aid physicians in the rapid discrimination of T2MI vs T1MI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter prospective diagnostic study was conducted in 12 emergency departments in 5 countries (Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Poland, and the Czech Republic) with patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency departments. The study quantified the discrimination of hs-cTn T, hs-cTn I, and 17 novel cardiovascular biomarkers measured in subsets of consecutively enrolled patients against a reference standard (final diagnosis), centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists according to the fourth universal definition of MI, using all information, including cardiac imaging and serial measurements of hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI. Results: Among 5887 patients, 1106 (18.8%) had an adjudicated final diagnosis of MI; of these, 860 patients (77.8%) had T1MI, and 246 patients (22.2%) had T2MI. Patients with T2MI vs those with T1MI had lower concentrations of biomarkers quantifying cardiomyocyte injury hs-cTnT (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 30 (17-55) ng/L vs 58 (28-150) ng/L), hs-cTnI (median [IQR], 23 [10-83] ng/L vs 115 [28-576] ng/L; P < .001), and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (at presentation: median [IQR], 76 [38-189] ng/L vs 257 [75-876] ng/L; P < .001) but higher concentrations of biomarkers quantifying endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, and/or hemodynamic stress (median [IQR] values: C-terminal proendothelin 1, 97 [75-134] pmol/L vs 68 [55-91] pmol/L; midregional proadrenomedullin, 0.97 [0.67-1.51] pmol/L vs 0.72 [0.53-0.99] pmol/L; midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide, 378 [207-491] pmol/L vs 152 [90-247] pmol/L; and growth differentiation factor 15, 2.26 [1.44-4.35] vs 1.56 [1.02-2.19] ng/L; all P < .001). Discrimination for these biomarkers, as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, was modest (hs-cTnT, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.64-0.71]; hs-cTn I, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67-0.74]; cardiac myosin-binding protein C, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61-0.73]; C-terminal proendothelin 1, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.83]; midregional proadrenomedullin, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.60-0.73]; midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68-0.87]; and growth differentiation factor 15, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58-0.79]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, biomarkers quantifying myocardial injury, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, and/or hemodynamic stress provided modest discrimination in early, noninvasive diagnosis of T2MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.