Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881401›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Acceptance, Barriers, and Future Preferences of Mobile Health Among Patients Receiving Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Care: Paper-Based Survey in a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Felix Reinecke, Florian Dittrich, Marcel Dudda, Andreas Stang, Christina Polan, Roman Müller, Paula Beck, Max Daniel Kauther

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Felix Reinecke *Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8762-9394
Florian Dittrich *Department of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5135-4736
Marcel DuddaDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-5506
Andreas StangInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-9061
Christina PolanDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-4674
Roman MüllerDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-454X
Paula BeckDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-611X
Max Daniel KautherDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3795-6068
Essen University Hospital · DEInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphones have become an essential part of everyday life and it is undeniable that apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in public health. Nevertheless, the exact patient requirements for medical apps in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery are currently unknown.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to define target groups, evaluate patient requirements, and the potential and pitfalls regarding medical apps specific for patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care.

methodsA prospective multicenter study was conducted between August 2018 and December 2019 at a German trauma center and 3 trauma surgery/orthopedic practices. A paper-based survey consisting of 15 questions evaluated information regarding smartphone and medical app usage behavior. In addition, suggested app functions were rated using Likert scales. Descriptive statistics and binary log-binomial regression were performed.

resultsA total of 1055 questionnaires were included in our statistical analysis. Approximately 89.57% (945/1055) of the patients in this study owned a smartphone. Smartphone ownership probability decreased with every decade of life and increased with higher levels of education. Medical information was obtained via mobile web access by 62.65% (661/1055) of the patients; this correlated with smartphone ownership in regard to age and educational level. Only 11.18% (118/1055) of the patients reported previous medical app usage, and 3.50% (37/1055) of the patients received an app recommendation from a physician. More than half (594/1055, 56.30%) of the patients were unwilling to pay for a medical app. The highest rated app functions were information about medication, behavioral guidelines, and medical record archival. An improved treatment experience was reported through the suggested app features by 71.18% (751/1055) of the patients.

conclusionsMobile devices are a widely used source of information for medical content, but only a minority of the population reported previous medical app usage. The main target group for medical apps among patients receiving orthopedic and trauma surgical care tends to be the younger population, which results in a danger of excluding fringe groups, especially the older adults. Education seems to be one of the most important pull factors to use smartphones or a mobile web connection to obtain health information. Medical apps primarily focusing on an optimized patient education and flow of information seem to have the potential to support patients in health issues, at least in their subjective perception. For future target group-oriented app developments, further evidence on the clinical application, feasibility, and acceptance of app usage are necessary in order to avoid patient endangerment and to limit socioeconomic costs.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineAgedHumansProspective StudiesSmartphoneSurveys and QuestionnairesappmHealthorthopedicssmartphonetrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID33881401
PMCPMC8100880
OpenAlexW3126647219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.