Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881209›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2021

A phase 1 study of prexasertib (LY2606368), a CHK1/2 inhibitor, in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trials Network (ADVL1515).

Thomas Cash, Elizabeth Fox, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G Minard, Joel M Reid, Adrienne C Scheck, Brenda J Weigel, Cynthia Wetmore

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic Targeting of DNA Damage Response Pathways inBrain tumor research and treatment · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Identifying novel SMYD3 interactors on the trail of cancer hallmarks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas CashDepartment of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-1128-784X
Elizabeth FoxDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Xiaowei LiuChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California.
Charles G MinardInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Joel M ReidMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Adrienne C ScheckCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Institute for Molecular Medicine, Department of Child Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
Brenda J WeigelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cynthia WetmoreCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Institute for Molecular Medicine, Department of Child Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
University of Arizona · USBaylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Oncology Group · USEmory University · USMayo Clinic · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
PEP-CTN EHR to RAVE supplementUM1CA228823 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Elizabeth Fox · 2018 to 2026
$39.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA228823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrexasertib (LY2606368) is a novel, second-generation, selective dual inhibitor of checkpoint kinase proteins 1 (CHK1) and 2 (CHK2). We conducted a phase 1 trial of prexasertib to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), to define and describe the toxicities, and to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of prexasertib in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

methodsPrexasertib was administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Four dose levels, 80, 100, 125, and 150 mg/m

resultsThirty patients were enrolled; 25 were evaluable. The median age was 9.5 years (range: 2-20) and 21 (70%) were male. Twelve patients (40%) had solid tumors and 18 patients (60%) had CNS tumors. There were no cycle 1 or later dose-limiting toxicities. Common cycle 1, drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities (> 10% of patients) included neutropenia (100%), leukopenia (68%), thrombocytopenia (24%), lymphopenia (24%), and anemia (12%). There were no objective responses; best overall response was stable disease in three patients for five cycles (hepatocellular carcinoma), three cycles (ependymoma), and five cycles (undifferentiated sarcoma). The PK appeared dose proportional across the 80-150 mg/m

conclusionsAlthough the MTD of prexasertib was not defined by this study, 150 mg/m

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAdolescentCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLeukopeniaMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeutropeniaProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazinesCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2CHEK1 protein, humanCHEK2 protein, humanprexasertibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazinesPyrazolesCHK1/2CHK1 inhibitorLY2606368pediatricphase 1prexasertib

Identifiers

PMID33881209
PMCPMC9090141
OpenAlexW3154342995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.