Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33880639›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

First-line methadone for cancer pain: titration time analysis.

Guillermo Mammana, Mariela Bertolino, Eduardo Bruera, Fernando Orellana, Fanny Vega, Gabriela Peirano, Sofía Bunge, Arnaldo Armesto, Graciela Dran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillermo Mammana *Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariela Bertolino *Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo BrueraDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, & Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Fernando OrellanaUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fanny VegaUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriela PeiranoUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sofía BungeUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Fundación FEMEBA, Hospital de Agudos Dr. E. Tornú, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arnaldo ArmestoCátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Graciela DranPrograma de Bioética, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), Buenos Aires, Argentina. gcolodran@gmail.com.
Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales · ARThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

Instituto Nacional del Cáncer 022/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethadone is a low-cost, strong opioid that is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for pain in palliative care (PC). Its long and unpredictable half-life and slow elimination phase can make titration challenging. Evidence for titration modalities is scarce.

objectiveTo describe the titration phase of the treatment with low-dose first-line methadone and the use of methadone for breakthrough pain.

methodsProspective study with strong opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe cancer pain followed at a tertiary PC unit in Argentina. Starting methadone dose was 2.5-5 mg/day every 8, 12, or 24 h. Titration allowed daily dose increases from day 1, and prescription of oral methadone 2.5 mg every 2 h with a maximum of 3 rescue doses/day for breakthrough pain. Pain control, methadone stabilization dose, and adverse effects, among other variables, were daily assessed over the first 7 days (T0-T7).

resultsSixty-two patients were included. Initial median (IQR) methadone dose was 5 (2.5) mg/day. Pain intensity decreased from a median (IQR) of 8 (2.3) at T0 to 4 (2.3) at T1 and remained ≤ 4 until T7 (all p < 0.0001 compared to T0). Similar results were obtained through the categorical and tolerability scales for pain. Fifty patients (81%) reached pain control, 66% in the first 48 h. Methadone daily doses at T2 and T7 were higher than that at T0: 7.5 (3) and 6.7 (5.5) versus 5 (2.5), respectively (all p < 0.05). The opioid escalation index at T7 was 1.7%. The median (IQR) number of rescues, stabilization dose, and time for stabilization was 0 (1), 5(4.5) mg, and 3(2) days, respectively. Two patients were discontinued due to delirium. All other side effects were mild.

conclusionsFirst-line, low-dose methadone using rescue methadone resulted in a pronounced and rapid decrease in pain, with minimal need for titration and for breakthrough doses, and no evidence of accumulation or sedation by the end of the week.

Indexed as

Breakthrough PainCancer PainNeoplasmsAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMethadoneProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneAdvanced cancerCancer painFirst-line methadoneTitration

Identifiers

PMID33880639
OpenAlexW3139460142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.