Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33880634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies.

Katharina Helm, Christian Matzenauer, Franz Neuhuber, Fabio Monticelli, Harald Meyer, Stefan Pittner, Walther Gotsmy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Survey of Haemosporidian Parasites in Wild Stone-Curlews (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Forensic neuropathology in the past decade: a scoping literature review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharina HelmDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. katharina.helm@sbg.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4436-1946
Christian MatzenauerDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Franz NeuhuberDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Fabio MonticelliDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Harald MeyerDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan PittnerDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Walther GotsmyDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Neuropsychiatry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When decomposition of a recovered body is fairly advanced, identification based on common morphologic features is often impossible. In these cases, short tandem repeat (STR) marker genotyping has established itself as a convenient and reliable alternative. However, at very progressed stages of decomposition, postmortem tissue putrefaction processes can decrease DNA yields considerably. Hence, not all types of tissue are equally suitable for successful STR marker-based postmortem identification. Bone or dental material is often analysed in corpses with advanced decompositional changes. However, processing of these materials is very elaborate and time and resource consuming. We have therefore focused on the suitableness of various types of soft tissue swabs, where DNA extraction is easier and faster. By sampling 28 bodies at various stages of decomposition, we evaluated the suitability of different tissues for genotyping at varying degrees of physical decay. This was achieved by a systematic classification of the sampled bodies by morphological scoring and subsequent analysis of multiple tissue swabs of the aortic wall, urinary bladder wall, brain, liver, oral mucosa and skeletal muscle. In summary, we found variable degrees of suitability of different types of soft tissue swabs for DNA-based identification. Swabs of the aortic wall, the urinary bladder wall and brain tissue yielded the best results - in descending order - even at advanced levels of decay.

Indexed as

AortaBody RemainsBrain ChemistryDNADNA Degradation, NecroticDNA FingerprintingFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansLiverMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMouth MucosaMuscle, SkeletalPostmortem ChangesUrinary BladderDNADecompositionDNA profilingForensic identificationSoft tissuesSTR marker

Identifiers

PMID33880634
PMCPMC8205910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.