ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021
Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotics improves reproducibility of component positioning while producing modest but measurable clinical benefits in total hip arthroplasty: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A meta-analysis.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2026Pooled it
- MAKO robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of Surgical Time, Short-term Adverse Events, and Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robotic-assisted, and Computer-navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system improves component positioning: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Validation of the Accuracy of Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty After Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Femoral stem alignment and post-operative patient satisfaction: a retrospective analysis of total hip arthroplasty using computer-assisted equipment for placing cups.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Japan's contributions to hip joint preservation and reconstruction: from osteonecrosis and developmental dysplasia to precision arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- THA for DDH: replacement principles and techniques - acetabular side.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Application of a Novel Surgical Instrumentation System for Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparing cup implantation errors in total hip arthroplasty following rotational acetabular osteotomy: computed tomography-based navigation versus robotic arm-assisted system.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- [Advances in application of digital orthopedic technology in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of hip].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Accuracy of intraoperative leg length and stem version measurements in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty using the Mako system with enhanced mode.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Center of rotation restoration and acetabular cup sizing in total hip arthroplasty: the predictive role of radiographic femoral head diameter. A single-center study from the FP-UCBM hip study group.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Lower-limb muscle mass quantification and whole-body muscle loss detection using preoperative computed tomography images in patients with hip disease.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of cup placement accuracy in computer assisted total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- A Handheld, Portable Image-Based System May Outperform Computer Navigation or Robotic Platforms in Providing Accurate Acetabular Component Positioning.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty outperforms manual technique in obese and overweight patients: a prospective comparative study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe investigated the accuracy of the acetabular cup position and orientation in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) compared to navigated THA (nTHA) using computed tomography (CT) for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
methodsWe studied 31 hips of 28 patients who underwent rTHA and 119 hips of 112 patients who underwent nTHA with the same target cup orientation. After propensity score matching, each group comprised 29 hips. Post-operative cup position and orientation were measured from the postoperative CT data. Errors from the target cup position and orientation were compared between the two groups.
resultsPost-operatively, the absolute error of the anteroposterior and superoinferior cup positions from the target position was significantly lower in the rTHA group than in the nTHA group. The change in the post-operative radiographic inclination from the target orientation was lower in the rTHA group than in the nTHA group. Screw fixation for cup implantation was required for three hips in the nTHA group but not in the rTHA group.
conclusionrTHA achieved more precise cup implantation with reduced variation from the target orientation compared to nTHA in patients with osteoarthritis secondary to DDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33880612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.