Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33880480›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2021

The emergence, surge and subsequent wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in New York metropolitan area: The view from a major region-wide urgent care provider.

Madhura S Rane, Angela Profeta, Emily Poehlein, Sarah Kulkarni, McKaylee Robertson, Chris Gainus, Ashish Parikh, Kerry LeBenger, Daniel Frogel, Denis Nash

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Madhura S RaneInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York. New York, NY USA.
Angela ProfetaCityMD/Summit Medical Group, New York, NY, USA.
Emily PoehleinInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York. New York, NY USA.
Sarah KulkarniInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York. New York, NY USA.
McKaylee RobertsonInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York. New York, NY USA.
Chris GainusCityMD/Summit Medical Group, New York, NY, USA.
Ashish ParikhCityMD/Summit Medical Group, New York, NY, USA.
Kerry LeBengerCityMD/Summit Medical Group, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel FrogelCityMD/Summit Medical Group, New York, NY, USA.
Denis NashInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York. New York, NY USA.

Funding

Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUH3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.9M
NIAID NIH HHS UH3 AI133675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDescribing SARS-CoV-2 testing and positivity trends among urgent care users is crucial for understanding the trajectory of the pandemic.

objectiveTo describe demographic and clinical characteristics, positivity rates, and repeat testing patterns among patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 at CityMD, an urgent care provider in the New York City metropolitan area.

designRetrospective study of all persons testing for SARS-CoV-2 between March 1, 2020 and January 8, 2021 at 115 CityMD locations in the New York metropolitan area. PATIENTS: Individuals receiving a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic or serologic test. MEASUREMENTS: Test and individual level SARS-CoV-2 positivity by PCR, rapid antigen, or serologic tests.

resultsDuring the study period, 3.4 million COVID tests were performed on 1.8 million individuals. In New York City, CityMD diagnosed 268,298 individuals, including 17% of all reported cases. Testing levels were higher among 20-29 year olds, non-Hispanic Whites, and females compared with other groups. About 24.8% (n=464,902) were repeat testers. Test positivity was higher in non-Hispanic Black (6.4%), Hispanic (8.0%), and Native American (8.0%) patients compared to non-Hispanic White (5.4%) patients. Overall seropositivity was estimated to be 21.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 21.6-21.8) and was highest among 10-14 year olds (27.3%). Seropositivity was also high among non-Hispanic Black (24.5%) and Hispanic (30.6%) testers, and residents of the Bronx (31.3%) and Queens (30.5%). Using PCR as the gold standard, SARS-CoV-2 rapid tests had a false positive rate of 5.4% (95%CI 5.3-5.5).

conclusionUrgent care centers can provide broad access to critical evaluation, diagnostic testing and treatment of a substantial number of ambulatory patients during pandemics, especially in population-dense, urban epicenters.

Identifiers

PMID33880480
PMCPMC8057248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.