Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33880433›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2021

Health Economic Aspects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapies for Hematological Cancers: Present and Future.

Renaud Heine, Frederick W Thielen, Marc Koopmanschap, Marie José Kersten, Hermann Einsele, Ulrich Jaeger, Pieter Sonneveld, Jorge Sierra, Carin Smand, Carin A Uyl-de Groot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Renaud HeineErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederick W ThielenErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc KoopmanschapErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie José KerstenDepartment of Haematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam and LYMMCARE (Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hermann EinseleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany.
Ulrich JaegerDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Pieter SonneveldErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jorge SierraDepartment of Haematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona, Spain.
Carin SmandEuropean Hematology Association, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Carin A Uyl-de GrootErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLEuropean Hematology Association · NLMedical University of Vienna · ATNovem (Netherlands) · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2018, 2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies received approval from the European Medicine Agency, with list prices around 320 000 Euro (€) (EUR) per treatment. These high prices raise concerns for patient access and the sustainability of healthcare systems. We aimed to estimate the costs and budget impact associated with CAR T-cell therapies for current and future indications in hematological cancers from 2019 to 2029. We focused on the former France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom (EU-5) and the Netherlands. We conducted a review of list prices, health technology assessment reports, budget impact analysis dossiers, and published cost-effectiveness analyses. We forecasted the 10-year health expenditures on CAR T-cells for several hematological cancers in selected European Union countries. Nine cost-effectiveness studies were identified and list prices for CAR T-cell therapies ranged between 307 200 EUR and 350 000 EUR. Estimated additional costs for pre- and post-treatment were 50 359 EUR per patient, whereas the incremental costs of CAR T-cell therapy (when compared with care as usual) ranged between 276 086 EUR and 328 727 EUR. We estimated market entry of CAR T-cell therapies for chronic mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia in 2021, 2022, 2022, 2022, and 2025, respectively. Cumulative expenditure estimates for existing and future indications from 2019 to 2029 were on average 28.5 billion EUR, 32.8 billion EUR, and 28.9 billion EUR when considering CAR T-cell therapy costs only, CAR T-cell therapy costs including pre- and post-treatment, and incremental CAR T-cell therapy costs, respectively. CAR T-cell therapies seem to be promising treatment options for hematological cancers but the financial burden on healthcare systems in the former EU-5 and the Netherlands will contribute to a substantial rise in healthcare expenditure in the field of hematology.

Identifiers

PMID33880433
PMCPMC8051992
OpenAlexW3154903133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.