ArticleCureus2021
Characterization of the ZAP-X® Peripheral Dose Fall-Off.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery using a self-shielded gyroscopic radiosurgery system for meningiomas: technical aspects and dosimetric results.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors: A comparative analysis of dose distributions among VMAT, Helical TomoTherapy, CyberKnife, Gamma Knife, and ZAP-X.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Treatment Plan Comparison Between Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery and Robotic Radiosurgery.Cureus · 2025Article
- Routine machine quality assurance tests for a self-shielded gyroscopic radiosurgery system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of plan quality and delivery efficiency: ZAP-X vs. CyberKnife for brain metastases treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various small-field radiation dose detectors were systematically compared and their impact on measured beam performance of the ZAP-X® dedicated stereotactic radiosurgery system (ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA) was determined. Three Physikalische Technische Werkstaetten (PTW) diodes, i.e., the microSilicon, the microDiamond, and the Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) diode detectors of (PTW-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany), as well as Gafchromic™ External Beam Therapy 3 (EBT) film (Ashland, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA), were used and compared to arrive at a recommended standard for this critical component of small-field beam measurements. Beam profiles, including the dose fall-off region near the edge of the beam, were measured with the PTW diodes and EBT3 film and subsequently contrasted. The impact of detector physical and dosimetric characteristics on the results of the measurements was investigated and compared with film measurements. The beam penumbra was used to quantify the dose fall-off. The measurement acquired with the diodes and film showed the most significant differences in the fall-off region near the field edge. The film-based measurements clearly showed the steepest dose gradient verified by the penumbra value of 1.21 mm, followed by the SRS diode with 1.60 mm, the microSilicon diode with 1.67 mm, and the microDiamond diode with 1.83 mm. A clear correlation of each detector's sensitive area with the penumbra was found, with the microDiamond detector at 2.2 mm diameter sensitive area having the largest penumbra, followed by the microSilicon and SRS diodes. Beam measurements for the purposes of system characterization or treatment planning system beam data acquisition depend, to a large extent, on detector characteristics. This is especially true for small-field dosimetry performed during stereotactic radiosurgery beam measurements. Careful consideration should be practiced which allows for the measurements to represent true beam characteristics and minimize the impact of the detector on the measurements. We conclude that film should be considered the reference method for such measurements with the ZAP-X due to its smallest physical measurement resolution of 23.1 µm. Potential drawbacks to this methodology are the need to calibrate the film relative to the dose and possible problems with saturation and non-linear film response for very high and very low optical densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.