Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33880113›Full record

SynthesisOccupational therapy international2021

Leisure and Productivity in Older Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Cynthia Engels, Robin Bairet, Florence Canoui-Poitrine, Marie Laurent

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational therapy international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Work, daily activities and leisure after cancer.European journal of cancer care · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia EngelsUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-5772
Robin BairetSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Florence Canoui-PoitrineUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-6051
Marie LaurentUniv Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-1277
Inserm · FRUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-care, leisure, and productivity are important occupational domains for older adults' quality of life, which might be affected by cancer and its treatment. A great number of publications about older adults focus on function or self-care, so we aimed to analyse how cancer and its treatments affect leisure and productivity. Secondary objectives were to identify whether particular clinical and/or sociodemographic factors were associated with occupational disruptions and to assess the impact of rehabilitation approaches on leisure and productivity in this population.

methodsA systematic review of the 2009-2019 literature performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

results1471 publications were retrieved: 48 full texts were assessed; seven of these (four cross-sectional studies, two cohort studies, and a case report) were reviewed, including data on 16668 people (12649 healthy controls, 3918 cancer survivors, and 101 ill patients). Older adults with comorbidities and a low level of activity before cancer diagnosis may be more at risk of occupational disruptions. However, studies focused more on physical activity than leisure and productivity. Two studies mentioned occupational therapy.

conclusionAn occupation-centred approach could be developed; its effectiveness must be assessed.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOccupational TherapyAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLeisure ActivitiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID33880113
PMCPMC8041549
OpenAlexW3149858594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.