Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879844›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Machine learning prediction of blood alcohol concentration: a digital signature of smart-breathalyzer behavior.

Kirstin Aschbacher, Christian S Hendershot, Geoffrey Tison, Judith A Hahn, Robert Avram, Jeffrey E Olgin, Gregory M Marcus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development and Performance Evaluation of an IoT-Integrated Breath Analyzer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirstin AschbacherDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Kirstin.Aschbacher@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6191-6432
Christian S HendershotDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Geoffrey TisonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-3326
Judith A HahnDivision of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert AvramDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-0270
Jeffrey E OlginDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gregory M MarcusDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Greg.marcus@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-7696
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Training in Research Program on Alcohol Use by Persons with our at Risk for HIVK24AA022586 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAHN, JUDITH ALISSA · 2013 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA022586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excess alcohol use is an important determinant of death and disability. Machine learning (ML)-driven interventions leveraging smart-breathalyzer data may help reduce these harms. We developed a digital phenotype of long-term smart-breathalyzer behavior to predict individuals' breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) levels trained on data from a smart breathalyzer. We analyzed roughly one million datapoints from 33,452 users of a commercial smart-breathalyzer device, collected between 2013 and 2017. For validation, we analyzed the associations between state-level observed smart-breathalyzer BrAC levels and impaired-driving motor vehicle death rates. Behavioral, geolocation-based, and time-series-derived features were fed to an ML algorithm using training (70% of the cohort), development (10% of the cohort), and test (20% of the cohort) sets to predict the likelihood of a BrAC exceeding the legal driving limit (0.08 g/dL). States with higher average BrAC levels had significantly higher alcohol-related driving death rates, adjusted for the number of users per state B (SE) = 91.38 (15.16), p < 0.01. In the independent test set, the ML algorithm predicted the likelihood of a given user-initiated BrAC sample exceeding BrAC ≥ 0.08 g/dL, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 85%. Highly predictive features included users' prior BrAC trends, subjective estimation of their BrAC (or AUC = 82% without the self-estimate), engagement and self-monitoring, time since the last measure, and hour of the day. In conclusion, an ML algorithm successfully quantified a digital phenotype of behavior, predicting naturalistic BrAC levels exceeding 0.08 g/dL (a threshold associated with alcohol-related harm) with good discrimination capability. This result establishes a foundation for future research on precision behavioral medicine digital health interventions using smart breathalyzers and passive monitoring approaches.

Identifiers

PMID33879844
PMCPMC8058037
OpenAlexW3155378790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.