ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021
Return to work status in rehabilitated South Indian persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with post spinal cord injury employment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Factors affecting return to work after spinal cord injury in Japan: a cross-sectional study.Spinal cord · 2025Article
- Rehabilitation Priorities and Employment Reintegration Among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Home-Based Care: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Functional and Social Determinants.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Vocational Rehabilitation in People with Spinal Cord Injury in Different Countries.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional, retrospective survey.
objectiveTo find the factors influencing the return to work status (RTW) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingTertiary care university teaching hospital, India.
methodsA total of 109 community-dwelling persons with SCI who had been previously rehabilitated and were residing within a 100 km radius from our rehabilitation center were recruited. The return to work status in addition to the demographic, injury, work, environment, physical, and psychosocial characteristics were self-reported via interview.
resultsThe return to work rate was 82%. The odds of a return to work post injury was 93 times higher for persons who reported high self-motivation when compared to persons who reported low self-motivation (OR = 93.6, 95% CI 10.5-836.6). The odds of a return to work were nine times higher for persons who reported adequate social support from the family and in the community when compared to those who reported inadequate social support (OR = 8.9, 95% CI 10.5-52.6). Other factors significantly associated with return to work status include younger age at injury, being single, lower level of lesion, vocational training, independence in self-care, and accessibility and mobility to all places.
conclusionMotivation and social support are critical to successful return to work following SCI. Comprehensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation, which targets vocational goals, improvements in individual functioning and mobility, and community access are important for successful employment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.