Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879722›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2021

Aggressive hydration with lactated ringer solution in prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mengmeng Wu, Shuaiyu Jiang, Xiaoguang Lu, Yilong Zhong, Yi Song, Zhiwei Fan, Xin Kang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07776561 (Preventing Post ERCP Pancreatitis by Short Stay Aggressive Hydration), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07776561 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Preventing Post ERCP Pancreatitis by Short Stay Aggressive Hydration (PuSH) -a Prospective Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestmead HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled1,300ConditionsPost-ERCP Pancreatitis, PancreatitisArmsShort-Stay Aggressive Hydration, Standard Peri-procedural Hydration, Rectal Indomethacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. [The Latest Knowledge on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-related Pancreatitis].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022
    Review
  12. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association guidelines for quality indicators in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mengmeng WuGraduate School, Dalian University, Dalian.
Shuaiyu JiangGraduate School, Dalian University, Dalian.
Xiaoguang LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Yilong ZhongGraduate School, Dalian University, Dalian.
Yi SongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Zhiwei FanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Xin KangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81673801,81473512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis is the most common complication of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There was no conclusion on the prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP) by Lactated Ringer Solution.

aimThe purpose of this meta analyses is to determine whether aggressive hydration with Lactated Ringer Solution reduced the incidence of PEP.

methodsWe retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the preventive effects of aggressive hydration with Lactated Ringer Solution and standard hydration on PEP from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Web of Science, Clinical Trial.gov, Scopus database, CNKI, CQVIP and WanFang Data. Primary outcome was incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hyperamylasemia, abdominal pain and adverse events.

resultsTen randomized controlled trials with 2200 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that compared with standard hydration, aggressive hydration reduced the incidence of PEP (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.26-0.63; P < .0001). Compared with standard hydration, aggressive hydration also reduced the incidence of hyperamylasemia after ERCP (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38-0.60; P < .0001). There was significant difference between aggressive hydration and standard hydration in the incidence of abdominal pain (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.73; P = .008). There was no difference in adverse events between aggressive hydration and standard hydration (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.21-4.13; P = .93). Sensitivity analyses showed that neither alternative effect measures nor statistical models regarding heterogeneity affected the conclusions of this meta-analysis.

conclusionAggressive hydration with Lactated Ringer Solution during perioperative period of ERCP can prevent PEP.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultAgedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRinger's LactateTreatment OutcomeRinger's Lactate

Identifiers

PMID33879722
PMCPMC8078315
OpenAlexW3153993193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.