ArticleMedicine2021
Effects of long noncoding RNA on prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the long non-coding RNA HOTAIR high expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- MALAT1 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma - A Systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is reported to be upregulated in many tumors. Although the expression of lncRNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma has been assessed, the association between lncRNA expression and prognosis or clinicopathological feature still remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to verify whether lncRNA expression was related to prognosis or clinicopathological features in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
methodsWe searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases from inception to February 2021. The language included Chinese and English. The published literature on lncRNA expression and prognosis or clinicopathological characteristics of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma was statistically analyzed. The combination of hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were applied to evaluate the effects of lncRNA on the prognosis and clinicopathological features of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
resultsThis study could provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence of lncRNA on the prognosis and clinicopathological features of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
conclusionThe conclusion of our study will provide the updated evidence to judge the lncRNA on the prognosis and clinicopathological features of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.