SynthesisAging2021
Comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of LPV/r drugs in the treatment of SARS and MERS to provide potential treatment options for COVID-19.
Synthesis in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation analysis of the serum CCR5 and LXA4 levels with airway remodelling in bronchial asthma patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum SERPINA3, CLEC2 and hs-CRP/ALB with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of the expression levels of serum endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and sirtuin 1 protein in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum SIRT4, CTRP5, and galectin-3 levels with the prognosis of diabetic retinopathy patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum CCL3, TRACP-5b, and sclerostin with the prognosis of multiple myeloma patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of inflammatory immune correlation of the coagulation spectrum, PT, FBG, FDP, D-D in autoimmune diseases.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of cytokine levels and peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets in systemic vascular inflammatory disease.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of Serum NT-pro-BNP, IGFBP-7 and CTRP12 levels in chronic heart failure patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- The influence of serum sterol sulfotransferase, ANGPTL8, and SDC1 on liver function in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis during pregnancy.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Serum sCD40L and galectin-3 in the prognosis prediction of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- The predictive value of serum OX-LDL and 25-(OH)-D levels for cerebral edema in patients with hypertensive cerebral haemorrhage.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum FGF9, Sestrin2 and HBDH with the severity of sepsis.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of Th1/Th2 cytokines and liver fibrosis indicators in chronic hepatitis B patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum PDK4, NLRP3, and PTEN levels in myocardial injury with sepsis.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum PACAP-38, fibulin-3 and TEM1 levels with cardiac function and prognosis in chronic heart failure patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of FABP3, MCP-4, and CXCL9 levels and myocardial damage in patients with severe pneumonia.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Serum human trophoblast cell surface antigen and T-box protein 5 levels play a role in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in eclampsia.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of PGC-1β, HIF-1α and RETN with the degree of joint destruction in gouty arthritis.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Serum MIC-1, LMTK-3 and IGFBP-7 levels in the prognosis of lung cancer treated with ablation combined with chemotherapy.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein, D-lactic acid and intercellular adhesion factor-1 in sepsis patients with intestinal ischemia.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experienced an outbreak that expanded worldwide. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), which is used effectively for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infections, was applied for COVID-19 treatment given similarities in the molecular structures of these viruses. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir antiviral treatment in patients with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. After registration with INPLASY, a search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and other databases for all relevant literature on lopinavir/ritonavir treatment of SARS, MERS and COVID-19. The Cochrane Collaboration's bias risk assessment tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to evaluate the quality of the literature, and RevMan 5.3 software was used to evaluate the relevant outcome indicators of the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. A total of 18 eligible studies (including randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies) were retrieved and included with a total of 2273 patients. The lopinavir/ritonavir group exhibited an increased nucleic acid conversion rate (P=0.004), higher virus clearance rate (P<0.0001), lower mortality rate (P=0.002), and reduced incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P=0.02) compared with the control group. No significant benefit in the improvement rate of chest CT (P=0.08) or incidence of adverse events (P=0.45) was noted. The lopinavir/ritonavir group had a lower incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (P=0.02). According to the clinical prognostic results, the incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant (P<0.0001). The efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of patients with SARS, MERS and COVID-19 was significantly better than that of the control. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events did not significantly increase. Lopinavir/ritonavir is effective in the treatment of COVID-19, and this combination should be further assessed in RCT studies. In addition, when we analyzed the differences in age and sex, we found that the differences were statistically significant in the safety and effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with COVID-19, and both of these factors played a significant role in the trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.