Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879487›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Codesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility study.

Victoria Williamson, Michael Larkin, Tessa Reardon, Samantha Pearcey, Claire Hill, Paul Stallard, Susan H Spence, Maria Breen, Ian Macdonald, Obioha Ukoumunne and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria WilliamsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England victoria.williamson@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3110-9856
Michael LarkinAston Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tessa ReardonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England.
Samantha PearceyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England.
Claire HillSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Paul StallardUniversity of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, Somerset, UK.
Susan H SpenceGriffith University, 16 Russell Street South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Maria BreenSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Ian MacdonaldCharlie Waller Memorial Trust, First Floor, Rear Office, Thatcham.
Obioha UkoumunneNIHR ARC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-9157
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mara ViolatoNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
Falko SniehottaPopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jason StainerStanley Primary School, Strathmore Road, London, UK.
Alastair GrayNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0239-7278
Paul BrownBransgore C Of E Primary School, Ringwood Rd, Bransgore, Christchurch, UK.
Michelle SanchoWest Berkshire Council, Council Offices, Market St, Newbury, UK.
Cathy CreswellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Reading · GBAston University · GBGriffith University · AUKing's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBWiltshire Council · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnxiety difficulties are among the most common mental health problems in childhood. Despite this, few children access evidence-based interventions, and school may be an ideal setting to improve children's access to treatment. This article describes the design, methods and expected data collection of the Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools - Identification to Intervention (iCATS i2i) study, which aims to develop acceptable school-based procedures to identify and support child anxiety difficulties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iCATS i2i will use a mixed-methods approach to codesign and deliver a set of procedures-or 'pathway'-to improve access to evidence-based intervention for child anxiety difficulties through primary schools in England. The study will consist of four stages, initially involving in-depth interviews with parents, children, school staff and stakeholders (stage 1) to inform the development of the pathway. The pathway will then be administered in two primary schools, including screening, feedback to parents and the offer of treatment where indicated (stage 2), with participating children, parents and school staff invited to provide feedback on their experience (stages 3 and 4). Data will be analysed using Template Analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The iCATS i2i study was approved by the University of Oxford's Research Ethics Committee (REF R64620/RE001). It is expected that this codesign study will lead on to a future feasibility study and, if indicated, a randomised controlled trial. The findings will be disseminated in several ways, including via lay summary report, publication in academic journals and presentation at conferences. By providing information on child, parent, school staff and other stakeholder's experiences, we anticipate that the findings will inform the development of an acceptable evidence-based pathway for identification and intervention for children with anxiety difficulties in primary schools and may also inform broader approaches to screening for and treating youth mental health problems outside of clinics.

Indexed as

AnxietySchoolsAdolescentChildEnglandFeasibility StudiesHumansParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicanxiety disorderschild & adolescent psychiatrymental healthprotocols & guidelinesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33879487
PMCPMC8061838
OpenAlexW3153937571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.