Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879364›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology2021

COVID-19 in Women's health reducing the risk of infection to patients and staff during acute and elective hospital admission for gynaecological surgery.

Funlayo Odejinmi, Elizabeth Egbase, T Justin Clark, Rebecca Mallick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Funlayo OdejinmiWhipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth EgbaseWhipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
T Justin ClarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca MallickPrincess Royal Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Haywards Heath, UK. Electronic address: rmallick@doctors.org.uk.
Whipps Cross University Hospital · GBBirmingham Women's Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel coronavirus SARS-Cov-2 has changed healthcare on a worldwide scale. This highly contagious respiratory virus has overwhelmed healthcare systems. Many staff were redeployed, and there was widespread cessation of non-urgent outpatient clinics and surgery. Outpatient clinics and theatre areas were converted to COVID-19 wards and intensive care units. Following the first peak, services began to recommence with new triaging and prioritisation guidance to safeguard patients and staff. Different countries and healthcare systems produced differing guidance and, in particular, variation in the best approach to continuing acute and elective surgical procedures. This chapter collates and evaluates the increasing international literature concerning the surgical management of gynaecological conditions during the pandemic, such that clear inferences, recommendations and guidance can be generated to aid clinical practice and safeguard against further major disruption arising from further COVID-19 peaks. The available data are assessed within the context of the current phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHospitalsHumansInfection ControlSARS-CoV-2Women's HealthCoronavirusCOVID-19GynaecologySurgery

Identifiers

PMID33879364
PMCPMC7970477
OpenAlexW3136516646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.