ArticleChinese neurosurgical journal2021
Death after discharge: prognostic model of 1-year mortality in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.
Article in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Mortality During In-Hospital Stay and the First 24 h After Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting outcomes after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using artificial intelligence: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Neurocritical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury : Past, Present and Future.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting outcomes in children with traumatic subdural hematoma.Acute and critical care · 2022Article
- Interpretable machine learning for in-hospital mortality prediction in ICU patients with traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances in decompressive craniectomy (DC) for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI), these patients are at risk of having a poor long-term prognosis. The aim of this study was to predict 1-year mortality in TBI patients undergoing DC using logistic regression and random tree models.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of TBI patients undergoing DC from January 1, 2015, to April 25, 2019. Patient demographic characteristics, biochemical tests, and intraoperative factors were collected. One-year mortality prognostic models were developed using multivariate logistic regression and random tree algorithms. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate model performance.
resultsOf the 230 patients, 70 (30.4%) died within 1 year. Older age (OR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.045-1.087; P < 0.001), higher Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) (OR, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.660-0.824; P < 0.001), higher D-dimer (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.009; P = 0.015), coagulopathy (OR, 2.965; 95% CI, 1.808-4.864; P < 0.001), hypotension (OR, 3.862; 95% CI, 2.176-6.855; P < 0.001), and completely effaced basal cisterns (OR, 3.766; 95% CI, 2.255-6.290; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of 1-year mortality. Random forest demonstrated better performance for 1-year mortality prediction, which achieved an overall accuracy of 0.810, sensitivity of 0.833, specificity of 0.800, and AUC of 0.830 on the testing data compared to the logistic regression model.
conclusionsThe random forest model showed relatively good predictive performance for 1-year mortality in TBI patients undergoing DC. Further external tests are required to verify our prognostic model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.