Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879242›Full record

SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2021

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co-infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Teng Li, Chengxin Luo, Jiasi Zhang, Ling Wei, Wei Sun, Qin Xie, Yan Liu, Yongli Zhao, Shuangnian Xu, Lihua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. [Research advances in mesenchymal stem cell therapy for graft-versus-host disease].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Study on theInternational journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Cell therapy in pediatric blood diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Role and prospect of regenerative medicine in early treatment of combat trauma].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teng Li *Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Chengxin Luo *Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Jiasi ZhangCenter for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Ling WeiCenter for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Wei SunTeaching-Research Office of Nursing, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Qin XieSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yan LiuSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yongli ZhaoCenter for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Shuangnian XuCenter for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China. xushuangnian@tmmu.edu.cn.
Lihua WangAdmin Office of Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China. 773569612@qq.com.
Army Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is life-saving for severe hematological conditions. However, its outcomes need further improvement, and co-infusion of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may show promise. A growing body of research on this subject exists, while the results of different trials are conflicting. A systematic review and meta-analysis is needed to appraise the real efficacy and safety of MSC co-transplantation in allo-HSCT.

methodsStudies comparing MSC co-transplantation in allo-HSCT with allo-HSCT alone were searched in six medical databases from inception to June 10, 2020. The primary outcomes were engraftment and graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively). Other outcomes included overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and immune reconstitution. Information was independently extracted by two investigators. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.

resultsSix randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) were included. MSC co-infusion resulted in shorter times to neutrophil engraftment (RCTs: standardized mean difference (SMD) - 1.20, p = 0.04; nRCTs: SMD - 0.54, p = 0.04) and platelet engraftment (RCTs: SMD - 0.60, p = 0.04; nRCTs: SMD - 0.70, p = 0.01), a lower risk of cGVHD (RCTs: risk ratio (RR) 0.53, p = 0.01; nRCTs: RR 0.50, p <  0.01), and a slightly positive trend towards reducing the risk of aGVHD and NRM, without affecting RR and OS. Subgroup analyses revealed that when MSCs were co-transplanted, children and adolescents, and patients receiving human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-nonidentical HSCT showed improvements in engraftment and incidence of GVHD and NRM; adults and patients who received HLA-identical HSCT had lower cGVHD; patients with malignancies exhibited improvements in GVHD and NRM incidence; and patients with non-malignancies experienced accelerated engraftment. Notably, a reduced OS was observed in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing HLA-identical HSCT.

conclusionMSC co-infusion generally improved engraftment and reduced cGVHD, without increasing mortality or relapse. Regarding aGVHD and NRM, the effects of MSCs were not quite significant. Specifically, our data support the utilization of MSC co-transplantation in children and young individuals with HLA-nonidentical HSCT, but not in adult patients with hematological malignancies undergoing HLA-identical HSCT.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultChildHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalEngraftmentGraft-versus-host diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID33879242
PMCPMC8056684
OpenAlexW3135311787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.