ArticleBMC health services research2021
Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between organizational readiness and implementation fidelity in national implementation of WHO's labour care guide in Sweden: a prospective observational study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) Scale Among Nurses in Chinese Healthcare Institutions: A Multilevel Psychometric Assessment.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025Review
- Understanding context: leveraging the pragmatic robust implementation sustainability model to inform the implementation of a community-based southeastern preconception counseling intervention to improve maternal health equity.Discover health systems · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Organisational Readiness for Change in Nurse- and Midwifery-Led Quality Improvement Initiatives.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Implementing the organizational readiness for change survey during a novel midwifery preceptor program in Sierra Leone: stakeholder results.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Ending the HIV Epidemic in Metropolitan Atlanta: a mixed-methods study to support the local HIV/AIDS response.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Organizational readiness and implementation fidelity of an early childhood education and care-specific physical activity policy intervention: findings from the Play Active trial.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Organizational readiness for change towards implementing a sepsis survivor hospital to home transition-in-care protocol.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Article
- Organizational readiness for change: A systematic review of the healthcare literature.Implementation research and practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sustainability of Australian rural maternity services is under threat due to current workforce shortages. In July 2019, a new midwifery caseload model of care was implemented in rural South Australia to provide midwifery continuity of care and promote a sustainable workforce in the area. The model is unique as it brings together five birthing sites connecting midwives, doctors, nurses and community teams. A critical precursor to successful implementation requires those working in the model be ready to adopt to the change. We surveyed clinicians at the five sites transitioning to the new model of care in order to assess their organizational readiness to implement change.
methodsA descriptive study assessing readiness for change was measured using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale (ORIC). The 12 item Likert scale measures a participant's commitment to change and change efficacy. All clinicians working within the model of care (midwives, nurses and doctors) were invited to complete an e-survey.
resultsOverall, 55% (56/102) of clinicians participating in the model responded. The mean ORIC score was 41.5 (range 12-60) suggesting collectively, midwives, nurses and doctors began the new model of care with a sense of readiness for change. Participants were most likely to agree on the change efficacy statements, "People who work here feel confident that the organization can get people invested in implementing this change and the change commitment statements "People who work here are determined to implement this change", "People who work here want to implement this change", and "People who work here are committed to implementing this change.
conclusionResults of the ORIC survey indicate that clinicians transitioning to the new model of care were willing to embrace change and commit to the new model. The process of organizational change in health care settings is challenging and a continuous process. If readiness for change is high, organizational members invest more in the change effort and exhibit greater persistence to overcome barriers and setbacks. This is the first reported use of the instrument amongst midwives and nurses in Australia and should be considered for use in other national and international clinical implementation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.