Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879145›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.

Pamela Adelson, Rachael Yates, Julie-Anne Fleet, Lois McKellar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela AdelsonRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. pam.adelson@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3346-1041
Rachael YatesRural Support Service, South Australia Health, Government of South Australia, Mount Gambier Health Service, Mount Gambier, SA, 5290, Australia.
Julie-Anne FleetRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Lois McKellarUniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUGovernment of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sustainability of Australian rural maternity services is under threat due to current workforce shortages. In July 2019, a new midwifery caseload model of care was implemented in rural South Australia to provide midwifery continuity of care and promote a sustainable workforce in the area. The model is unique as it brings together five birthing sites connecting midwives, doctors, nurses and community teams. A critical precursor to successful implementation requires those working in the model be ready to adopt to the change. We surveyed clinicians at the five sites transitioning to the new model of care in order to assess their organizational readiness to implement change.

methodsA descriptive study assessing readiness for change was measured using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale (ORIC). The 12 item Likert scale measures a participant's commitment to change and change efficacy. All clinicians working within the model of care (midwives, nurses and doctors) were invited to complete an e-survey.

resultsOverall, 55% (56/102) of clinicians participating in the model responded. The mean ORIC score was 41.5 (range 12-60) suggesting collectively, midwives, nurses and doctors began the new model of care with a sense of readiness for change. Participants were most likely to agree on the change efficacy statements, "People who work here feel confident that the organization can get people invested in implementing this change and the change commitment statements "People who work here are determined to implement this change", "People who work here want to implement this change", and "People who work here are committed to implementing this change.

conclusionResults of the ORIC survey indicate that clinicians transitioning to the new model of care were willing to embrace change and commit to the new model. The process of organizational change in health care settings is challenging and a continuous process. If readiness for change is high, organizational members invest more in the change effort and exhibit greater persistence to overcome barriers and setbacks. This is the first reported use of the instrument amongst midwives and nurses in Australia and should be considered for use in other national and international clinical implementation studies.

Indexed as

MidwiferyAustraliaFemaleHumansOrganizational InnovationOrganizationsPregnancySouth AustraliaSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliaContinuity of careMidwiferyOrganizational readinessORICRural and remoteWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID33879145
PMCPMC8056551
OpenAlexW3153962535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.