Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879117›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

The potential dangers of not understanding COVID-19 public health restrictions in dementia: "It's a groundhog day - every single day she does not understand why she can't go out for a walk".

Clarissa Giebel, Kerry Hanna, Manoj Rajagopal, Aravind Komuravelli, Jacqueline Cannon, Justine Shenton, Ruth Eley, Anna Gaughan, Steve Callaghan, Hilary Tetlow and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. Clarissa.giebel@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566
Kerry HannaDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Manoj RajagopalLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Trust, Preston, UK.
Aravind KomuravelliNorth West Boroughs NHS Trust, Warrington, UK.
Jacqueline CannonLewy Body Society, Wigan, UK.
Justine ShentonSefton Older People's Forum, Liverpool, UK.
Ruth EleyLiverpool Dementia Action Alliance, Liverpool, UK.
Anna GaughanTogether In Dementia Everyday (TIDE), Liverpool, UK.
Steve CallaghanEQE Health, Liverpool, UK.
Hilary TetlowSURF Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stan LimbertNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Rosie WhittingtonMe2U Day Care Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Carol RogersNational Museums Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Kym WardThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, UK.
Lisa ShawDepartment of Modern Languages and Cultures, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah ButchardDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBDementia UK · GBBrain Tumour Charity · GBLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Museums Liverpool · GBNorth West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Lewy Body Society · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research ARC NWC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSudden public health restrictions can be difficult to comprehend for people with cognitive deficits. However, these are even more important for them to adhere to due to their increased levels of vulnerability, particularly to COVID-19. With a lack of previous evidence, we explored the understanding and changes in adherence to COVID-19 public health restrictions over time in people living with dementia (PLWD).

methodsUnpaid carers and PLWD were interviewed over the phone in April 2020, shortly after the nationwide UK lockdown, with a proportion followed up from 24th June to 10th July. Participants were recruited via social care and third sector organisations across the UK, and via social media.

findingsA total of 70 interviews (50 baseline, 20 follow-up) were completed with unpaid carers and PLWD. Five themes emerged: Confusion and limited comprehension; Frustration and burden; Putting oneself in danger; Adherence to restrictions in wider society; (Un) changed perceptions. Most carers reported limited to no understanding of the public health measures in PLWD, causing distress and frustration for both the carer and the PLWD. Due to the lack of understanding, some PLWD put themselves in dangerous situations without adhering to the restrictions. PLWD with cognitive capacity who participated understood the measures and adhered to these. DISCUSSION: In light of the new second wave of the pandemic, public health measures need to be simpler for PLWD to avoid unwilful non-adherence. Society also needs to be more adaptive to the needs of people with cognitive disabilities more widely, as blanket rules cause distress to the lives of those affected by dementia.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlComprehensionDementiaCaregiversCOVID-19FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPublic HealthUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33879117
PMCPMC8057664
OpenAlexW3155402368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.