Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879075›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical imaging2021

Patterns of use, effectiveness and safety of gadolinium contrast agents: a European prospective cross-sectional multicentre observational study.

Jarl Åsbjørn Jakobsen, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi, Frank H H Müller, Olivier Outteryck, Andrés Alcázar, Wolfgang Reith, Patricia Fraga, Valeria Panebianco, Alexis Sampedro, Radoslaw Pietura

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents and the Theater of Safety.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jarl Åsbjørn JakobsenOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. j.a.jakobsen@medisin.uio.no.
Carlo Cosimo QuattrocchiUniversità Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Frank H H MüllerRadiologie Und Nuklearmedizin Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Olivier OutteryckDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Andrés AlcázarFundación Jiménez-Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Wolfgang ReithUniversitätsklinikum Des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Patricia FragaHospital Universitario del Henares, Unidad Central de Radiodiagnóstico, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Valeria PanebiancoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alexis SampedroGE Healthcare, Madrid, Spain.
Radoslaw PieturaDepartment of Radiography, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EU gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) market has changed in recent years due to the European Medicines Agency decision to suspend the marketing authorisation of linear GBCA and the marketing authorisation of new generic macrocyclic GBCA. The study aims to understand the patterns of (GBCA) use, and to study the effectiveness and safety of GBCA in routine practice across Europe.

methodsProspective, cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Reported usage patterns included indication, referral and examination details. Assessment of effectiveness included changes in radiological diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and image quality. Safety data were collected by spontaneous patient adverse event (AE) reporting.

results2118 patients were included from 8 centres across 5 European countries between December 2018 and November 2019. Clariscan, Dotarem (gadoteric acid), Gadovist (gadobutrol) and ProHance (gadoteridol) were utilised in 1513 (71.4%), 356 (16.8%), 237 (11.2%) and 12 (0.6%) patients, respectively. Most were performed in CNS-related indications (46.2%). Mean GBCA doses were 0.10 mmol/kg body weight, except for Gadovist (mean 0.12 mmol/kg). GBCA use increased confidence in diagnosis in 96.2% of examinations and resulted in a change in radiological diagnosis in 73.9% of patients. Image quality was considered excellent or good in 96.1% of patients and across all GBCA. Four patients reported AEs (0.19%), with only 1 (0.05%) considered serious.

conclusionsThis European study confirmed that GBCAs are used appropriately in Europe for a wide range of indications. The study demonstrated a significant increase in diagnostic confidence after GBCA use and confirmed the good safety profile of GBCAs, with comparable results for all agents used.

Indexed as

AdultAgedComorbidityContrast MediaCross-Sectional StudiesDextransEuropeFemaleGadoliniumHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedContrast MediaDextransferumoxtran-10gadobutrolGadoliniumgadoterate megluminegadoteridolHeterocyclic CompoundsMagnetite NanoparticlesMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsAdverse eventsDiagnostic confidenceGadoliniumImage qualityMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID33879075
PMCPMC8056663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.