Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879050›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

AutoDTI++: deep unsupervised learning for DTI prediction by autoencoders.

Seyedeh Zahra Sajadi, Mohammad Ali Zare Chahooki, Sajjad Gharaghani, Karim Abbasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A brief review of protein-ligand interaction prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seyedeh Zahra SajadiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Mohammad Ali Zare ChahookiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. chahooki@yazd.ac.ir.
Sajjad GharaghaniLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Drug Design (LBD), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Karim AbbasiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Drug Design (LBD), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-target interaction (DTI) plays a vital role in drug discovery. Identifying drug-target interactions related to wet-lab experiments are costly, laborious, and time-consuming. Therefore, computational methods to predict drug-target interactions are an essential task in the drug discovery process. Meanwhile, computational methods can reduce search space by proposing potential drugs already validated on wet-lab experiments. Recently, deep learning-based methods in drug-target interaction prediction have gotten more attention. Traditionally, DTI prediction methods' performance heavily depends on additional information, such as protein sequence and molecular structure of the drug, as well as deep supervised learning.

resultsThis paper proposes a method based on deep unsupervised learning for drug-target interaction prediction called AutoDTI++. The proposed method includes three steps. The first step is to pre-process the interaction matrix. Since the interaction matrix is sparse, we solved the sparsity of the interaction matrix with drug fingerprints. Then, in the second step, the AutoDTI approach is introduced. In the third step, we post-preprocess the output of the AutoDTI model.

conclusionsExperimental results have shown that we were able to improve the prediction performance. To this end, the proposed method has been compared to other algorithms using the same reference datasets. The proposed method indicates that the experimental results of running five repetitions of tenfold cross-validation on golden standard datasets (Nuclear Receptors, GPCRs, Ion channels, and Enzymes) achieve good performance with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentUnsupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceDrug DiscoveryDeep learningDenoising autoencoderDrug-target interactionsLatent featureUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33879050
PMCPMC8056558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.