Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878814›Full record

ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2021

Consensus on thromboprophylaxis in gynecological surgery

Grupo Desarrollador Del Consenso De Tromboprofilaxis En Cirugía Ginecológica, Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia Y Ginecología Fecolsog

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grupo Desarrollador Del Consenso De Tromboprofilaxis En Cirugía Ginecológica. cfgrilloa@unal.edu.co.
Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia Y Ginecología Fecolsog. cfgrilloa@unal.edu.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To draw a synthesis of the available evidence regarding interventions for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during the perioperative care of women with benign gynecological pathology, with the aim of reducing the associated morbidity and mortality. Materials and methods: The development group included healthcare professionals, decision-makers and one patient representative. All the participants stated their disclosures. Answerable clinical questions were built and outcomes were graded. The search for information was conducted in Medline, Embase, Epistemonikos and LILACS, but it also included grey literature and was updated on September 22, 2020, with no date or language restrictions. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. Formal consensus was developed in accordance with the RAND/UCLA methodology. The document was submitted to peer review before publication. Results: The abbreviated version of the “consensus on the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during the perioperative care of women with benign gynecological pathology” is presented together with the supporting evidence and respective recommendations. Conclusions: The key recommendations for implementation include the use of the Caprini scale and of interventions consistent with the individual perioperative risk level.

Indexed as

Venous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansAnticoagulantsanticoagulantsconsensusperioperative periodpulmonary embolismvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID33878814
PMCPMC8372767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.