Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878803›Full record

ReviewAnaesthesia2021

General anaesthesia in end-of-life care: extending the indications for anaesthesia beyond surgery.

A Takla, J Savulescu, D J C Wilkinson, J J Pandit

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care.Journal of medical ethics · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A TaklaUehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J SavulescuUehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
D J C WilkinsonUehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J J PanditNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT203132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe an extension of general anaesthesia - beyond facilitating surgery - to the relief of suffering during dying. Some refractory symptoms at the end of life (pain, delirium, distress, dyspnoea) might be managed by analgesia, but in high doses, adverse effects (e.g. respiratory depression) can hasten death. Sedation may be needed for agitation or distress and can be administered as continuous deep sedation (also referred to as terminal or palliative sedation) generally using benzodiazepines. However, for some patients these interventions are not enough, and others may express a clear desire to be completely unconscious as they die. We summarise the historical background of an established practice that we refer to as 'general anaesthesia in end-of-life care'. We discuss its contexts and some ethical and legal issues that it raises, arguing that these are largely similar issues to those already raised by continuous deep sedation. To be a valid option, general anaesthesia in end-of-life care will require a clear multidisciplinary framework and consensus practice guidelines. We see these as an impending development for which the specialty should prepare. General anaesthesia in end-of-life care raises an important debate about the possible role of anaesthesia in the relief of suffering beyond the context of surgical/diagnostic interventions.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesiologyHumansTerminal Caredyingethicsgeneral anaesthesiapalliative caresedation

Identifiers

PMID33878803
PMCPMC8581983
OpenAlexW3134667997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.