ArticleThe Knee2021
Longitudinal study of knee load avoidant movement behavior after total knee arthroplasty with recommendations for future retraining interventions.
Article in The Knee, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asymmetrical biomechanics in knee osteoarthritis: a review of contralateral risk from primary disease to post-arthroplasty progression.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Peak, cumulative and rate of medial and lateral compartment joint loading during gait following total knee arthroplasty.Gait & posture · 2025Article
- Stepping beyond Counts in Recovery of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study on Passively Collected Gait Metrics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate clinical and biomechanical changes in self-report survey, quadriceps strength and gait analysis over 3- and 6-months post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and confirm the immediate effects of two forms of kinetic biofeedback on improving inter-limb biomechanics during a physically demanding decline walking task.
methodsThirty patients with unilateral TKA underwent testing at 3- and 6-months following surgery. All underwent self-report survey, quadriceps strength and gait analysis testing. Patients were assigned to one of two types of biofeedback [vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), knee extensor moment (KEM)].
resultsNo decrease in gait asymmetry was observed in non-biofeedback trials over time (p > 0.05), despite significant improvements in self-report physical function (p < 0.01, Cohen d = 0.44), pain interference (p = 0.01, Cohen d = 0.68), numeric knee pain (p = 0.01, Cohen d = 0.74) and quadriceps strength (p = 0.01, Cohen d = 0.49) outcomes. KEM biofeedback induced significant decrease in total support moment (p = 0.05, Cohen f
conclusionGait compensation remained similar from 3- to 6-months during a task requiring greater knee demand compared to overground walking post-TKA, despite improvements in self-report survey and quadriceps strength. Single session gait symmetry training at 6-month supports findings at 3-month testing that motor learning is possible. KEM biofeedback is more effective at immediately improving joint kinetic loading compared to vGRF biofeedback post-TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.