Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878506›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2021

Cost-effectiveness of bezlotoxumab and fidaxomicin for initial Clostridioides difficile infection.

Jiahe Chen, Cynthia L Gong, Matthew M Hitchcock, Marisa Holubar, Stanley Deresinski, Joel W Hay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. De novo design of potent inhibitors of clostridial family toxins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinician Management Preferences forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutics involved in managing initial and recurrentWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Best Practices in the Management ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Encapsulation protocol for fecal microbiota transplantation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Host Immune Responses toTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: from guidelines to clinical practice.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiahe ChenSchaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical & Health Economics, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cynthia L GongSchaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Fetal & Neonatal Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: gongc@usc.edu.
Matthew M HitchcockCentral Virginia VA Health Care System, Richmond, VA, USA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Marisa HolubarStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanley DeresinskiStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Joel W HaySchaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical & Health Economics, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California · USStanford University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007502 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Prasanna Jagannathan, DAVID A. RELMAN · 1995 to 2026
$6.8M
Global Epidemiology of Infectious DiseasesT32AI052073 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Angelle Desiree LaBeaud, Stephen Patrick Luby · 2003 to 2026
$4.2M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007502NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTreatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has undergone significant change in recent years with the introduction of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab for initial CDI compared with standard therapy with oral vancomycin.

methodsA Markov model with eight health states was built based on transition probabilities, costs and health utilities derived from literature to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of standard fidaxomicin, bezlotoxumab plus vancomycin, and extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus standard oral vancomycin over a lifetime horizon from the US societal perspective.

resultsFor overall CDI treatment, oral vancomycin had a cost of $39 178 and was associated with a gain of 11.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin had a higher QALY gain of 11.65 at a lower cost of $37 613, and therefore was dominant over vancomycin. Standard fidaxomicin had a QALY gain of 11.94 versus vancomycin at an incremental cost of $495 per QALY. Bezlotoxumab plus vancomycin led to a QALY gain of 11.77 at an incremental cost of $17 746 per QALY. At the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per QALY, extended-pulsed fidaxomicin, bezlotoxumab plus vancomycin and standard fidaxomicin were more cost-effective compared with vancomycin alone, yielding incremental net monetary benefits of $3248, $17 011 and $44 308, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the probabilities of sustained cure from the initial episode were the most sensitive inputs, and results were overall not particularly sensitive to any drug costs.

conclusionsBased on a WTP threshold of $150 000, standard fidaxomicin was estimated to be the most cost-effective treatment. Standard-of-care vancomycin was dominated by extended-pulsed fidaxomicin for treating an episode of CDI and preventing further recurrence, and the addition of bezlotoxumab to vancomycin was dominated by standard fidaxomicin.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesClostridium InfectionsFidaxomicinVancomycinClostridioides difficileCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalbezlotoxumabBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesFidaxomicinVancomycinBacterial resistanceBezlotoxumabClostridioides difficileinfectionCost-effectiveness analysisExtended-pulsed fidaxomicinFidaxomicinIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio

Identifiers

PMID33878506
PMCPMC9478885
OpenAlexW3154522667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.