Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878383›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Brain network mechanisms of visual shape completion.

Brian P Keane, Deanna M Barch, Ravi D Mill, Steven M Silverstein, Bart Krekelberg, Michael W Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impaired Contour Object Perception in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impaired contour object perception in psychosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian P KeaneUniversity Behavioral Health Care, Department of Psychiatry, and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Electronic address: brian_keane@urmc.rochester.edu.
Deanna M BarchDepartments of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Ravi D MillCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 197 University Ave 07102, USA.
Steven M SilversteinUniversity Behavioral Health Care, Department of Psychiatry, and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, USA.
Bart KrekelbergCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 197 University Ave 07102, USA.
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 197 University Ave 07102, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of perceptual organization deficits across the schizo-bipolar spectrumK01MH108783 · NIMH · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI KEANE, BRIAN PATRICK · 2016 to 2019
$680k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH108783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual shape completion recovers object shape, size, and number from spatially segregated edges. Despite being extensively investigated, the process's underlying brain regions, networks, and functional connections are still not well understood. To shed light on the topic, we scanned (fMRI) healthy adults during rest and during a task in which they discriminated pac-man configurations that formed or failed to form completed shapes (illusory and fragmented condition, respectively). Task activation differences (illusory-fragmented), resting-state functional connectivity, and multivariate patterns were identified on the cortical surface using 360 predefined parcels and 12 functional networks composed of such parcels. Brain activity flow mapping (ActFlow) was used to evaluate the likely involvement of resting-state connections for shape completion. We identified 36 differentially-active parcels including a posterior temporal region, PH, whose activity was consistent across 95% of observers. Significant task regions primarily occupied the secondary visual network but also incorporated the frontoparietal, dorsal attention, default mode, and cingulo-opercular networks. Each parcel's task activation difference could be modeled via its resting-state connections with the remaining parcels (r=.62, p<10

Indexed as

AdultCerebral CortexConnectomeFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultArea PHDorsal attention networkFrontoparietal networkKanizsa shapesResting-state functional connectivitySecondary visual networkSubjective contours

Identifiers

PMID33878383
PMCPMC8456451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.