Trial reportCancer2021
Early ultrasound evaluation identifies excellent responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Trial report in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zanidatamab in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: the NeoZanHER phase 2 single-arm open-label trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Early Prediction of the Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Based on Intratumoral Interstitial Fluid Pressure using 3-D Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of clinical models based on ultrasound, serum CA153 and molecular subtype in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence, clinical boundaries and emerging strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- The utilization of CEUS and SWE for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early tumour size changes from neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a predictor of pathologic response in breast cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Early tumor volume reduction by breast DCE MRI predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in triple negative breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- The Role of Quantitative Ultrasound in Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer using an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- An ultrasound-based model for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early stage triple negative breast cancer patients.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Prediction model for assessing HER2 status patient with invasive ductal carcinoma based on clinical parameters and ultrasound features: a dual-center study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Knowledge mapping of ultrasound technology and triple-negative breast cancer: a visual and bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Dynamic ultrasound-based modeling predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correlation between Baseline Conventional Ultrasounds, Shear-Wave Elastography Indicators, and Neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Breast Cancer After Two Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Tumor Reduction Rate: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of breast cancer · 2023Article
- Changes in the tumor oxygenation but not in the tumor volume and tumor vascularization reflect early response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: an evaluation of its efficacy and research progress.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- An integrated deep learning model for the prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with serial ultrasonography in breast cancer patients: a multicentre, retrospective study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeterogeneity exists in the response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to standard anthracycline (AC)/taxane-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), with 40% to 50% of patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Early assessment of the imaging response during NAST may identify a subset of TNBCs that are likely to have a pCR upon completion of treatment. The authors aimed to evaluate the performance of early ultrasound (US) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant NAST in identifying excellent responders to NAST among patients with TNBC.
methodsTwo hundred fifteen patients with TNBC were enrolled in the ongoing ARTEMIS (A Robust TNBC Evaluation Framework to Improve Survival) clinical trial. The patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n = 107) and a validation cohort (n = 108). A receiver operating characteristic analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to model the probability of a pCR on the basis of the tumor volume reduction (TVR) percentage by US from the baseline to after 2 cycles of AC.
resultsOverall, 39.3% of the patients (42 of 107) achieved a pCR. A positive predictive value (PPV) analysis identified a cutoff point of 80% TVR after 2 cycles; the pCR rate was 77% (17 of 22) in patients with a TVR ≥ 80%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .0001). In the validation cohort, the pCR rate was 44%. The PPV for pCR with a TVR ≥ 80% after 2 cycles was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%), and the AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87; P < .0001).
conclusionsThe TVR percentage by US evaluation after 2 cycles of NAST may be a cost-effective early imaging biomarker for a pCR to AC/taxane-based NAST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.