Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878107›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

The SIMAC study: A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of resistance training and aerobic training on the fitness and body composition of Colombian adolescents.

Daniel Dylan Cohen, Gavin R Sandercock, Paul Anthony Camacho, Johanna Otero-Wandurraga, Sandra Milena Pinzon Romero, Rocío Del Pilar Martínez Marín, Camilo Andrés Villamizar Sierra, Javier Carreño, Jason Moran, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel Dylan CohenMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0899-4623
Gavin R SandercockEssex University, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Paul Anthony CamachoFundación Oftalmologica de Santander (FOSCAL), Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Johanna Otero-WandurragaMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Sandra Milena Pinzon RomeroDepartment of Human Movement, Universidad Autonoma de Manizales (UAM), Manizales, Colombia.
Rocío Del Pilar Martínez MarínMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Camilo Andrés Villamizar SierraMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Javier CarreñoMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5460-6946
Jason MoranFundación Oftalmologica de Santander (FOSCAL), Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Patricio Lopez-JaramilloMasira Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on muscle strength, aerobic fitness and body composition, of replacing the physical education (PE) class of Colombian adolescents with resistance or aerobic training. 120 tanner stage 3 adolescents attending a state school were randomized to resistance training, aerobic training, or a control group who continued to attend a weekly 2- hour PE class for 16 weeks. The resistance training and aerobic training groups participated in twice weekly supervised after-school exercise sessions of < 1 hour instead of their PE class. Sum of skinfolds, lean body mass (bioelectrical impedance analysis), muscular strength (6 repetition maximum (RM)) bench press, lateral pulldown and leg press) and estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (multistage 20 meter shuttle run) were assessed at pre and post intervention. Complete data were available for n = 40 of the resistance training group, n = 40 of the aerobic training group and n = 30 PE (controls). Resistance training attenuated increases in sum of skinfolds compared with controls (d = 0.27, [0.09-0.36]). We found no significant effect on lean body mass. Resistance training produced a positive effect on muscle strength compared with both controls (d = 0.66 [.49-.86]) and aerobic training (d = 0.55[0.28-0.67]). There was a positive effect of resistance training on cardiorespiratory fitness compared with controls (d = 0.04 [-0.10-0.12]) but not compared with aerobic training (d = 0.24 [0.10-0.36]). Replacing a 2-hour PE class with two 1 hour resistance training sessions attenuated gains in subcutaneous adiposity, and enhanced muscle strength and aerobic fitness development in Colombian youth, based on a median attendance of approximately 1 session a week. Further research to assess whether adequate stimuli for the development of muscular fitness exists within current physical education provision is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentBody CompositionCardiorespiratory FitnessColombiaExerciseExercise TestExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthObesityPhysical FitnessResistance TrainingWeight Lifting

Identifiers

PMID33878107
PMCPMC8057582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.