Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33878023›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

An App-Based Intervention to Support First Responders and Essential Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Needs Assessment and Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

Stacie Vilendrer, Alexis Amano, Cati G Brown Johnson, Marissa Favet, Nadia Safaeinili, Jacqueline Villasenor, Jonathan G Shaw, Attila J Hertelendy, Steven M Asch, Megan Mahoney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Stacie VilendrerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-5973
Alexis AmanoDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-2197
Cati G Brown JohnsonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-3665
Marissa FavetCollege of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-8235
Nadia SafaeiniliHealth Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-3091
Jacqueline VillasenorJohn Muir College, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0678-2958
Jonathan G ShawDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-3604
Attila J HertelendyDepartment of Information Systems and Business Analytics, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6174-0289
Steven M AschDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-5335
Megan MahoneyDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9166-9575
Stanford University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCenter for Innovation · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for first responders (eg, police, fire, and emergency medical services) and nonmedical essential workers (eg, workers in food, transportation, and other industries). Health systems may be uniquely suited to support these workers given their medical expertise, and mobile apps can reach local communities despite social distancing requirements. Formal evaluation of real-world mobile app-based interventions is lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the adoption, acceptability, and appropriateness of an academic medical center-sponsored app-based intervention (COVID-19 Guide App) designed to support access of first responders and essential workers to COVID-19 information and testing services. We also sought to better understand the COVID-19-related needs of these workers early in the pandemic.

methodsTo understand overall community adoption, views and download data of the COVID-19 Guide App were described. To understand the adoption, appropriateness, and acceptability of the app and the unmet needs of workers, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone, by video, and in person with first responders and essential workers in the San Francisco Bay Area who were recruited through purposive, convenience, and snowball sampling. Interview transcripts and field notes were qualitatively analyzed and presented using an implementation outcomes framework.

resultsFrom its launch in April 2020 to September 2020, the app received 8262 views from unique devices and 6640 downloads (80.4% conversion rate, 0.61% adoption rate across the Bay Area). App acceptability was mixed among the 17 first responders interviewed and high among the 10 essential workers interviewed. Select themes included the need for personalized and accurate information, access to testing, and securing personal safety. First responders faced additional challenges related to interprofessional coordination and a "culture of heroism" that could both protect against and exacerbate health vulnerability.

conclusionsFirst responders and essential workers both reported challenges related to obtaining accurate information, testing services, and other resources. A mobile app intervention has the potential to combat these challenges through the provision of disease-specific information and access to testing services but may be most effective if delivered as part of a larger ecosystem of support. Differentiated interventions that acknowledge and address the divergent needs between first responders and non-first responder essential workers may optimize acceptance and adoption.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCOVID-19Emergency RespondersFemaleHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsNeeds AssessmentPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Young AdultaccessibilityadoptionappCOVID-19disastersemergency respondershealth behaviorhealth literacyinterventionliteracynatural disasterspandemicphysicianspolicequality improvementsocial mediasupporttestingusability

Identifiers

PMID33878023
PMCPMC8139393
OpenAlexW3155305866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.