ArticleCurrent medical science2021
Rapid Establishment of Tracheal Stenosis in Pigs Using Endotracheal Tube Cuff Overpressure and Electrocautery.
Article in Current medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for patients with tracheal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Animal models of benign airway stenosis: Advances in construction techniques, evaluation systems, and perspectives.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of mechanical injury methods for establishing stable tracheal stenosis animal models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Low-Volume, Low-Pressure Tracheostomy Cuffs on Acute Mucosal Injury in Swine.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- The mechanical characteristics and performance evaluation of a newly developed silicone airway stent (GINA stent).Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To apply a new airway treatment to humans, preclinical studies in an appropriate animal model is needed. Canine, porcine and leporine tracheas have been employed as animal airway stenosis models using various methods such as chemical caustic agents, laser, and electrocautery. However, existing models take a long time to develop (3-8 weeks) and the mechanism of stenosis is different from that in humans. The aim of the present study was to establish a new and fast tracheal stenosis model in pigs using a combination of cuff overpressure intubation (COI) and electrocautery. Fourteen pigs were divided into three groups: tracheal cautery (TC) group (n=3), COI group (n=3), and COI-TC combination group (n=8). Cuff overpressure (200/400/500 mmHg) was applied using a 9-mm endotracheal tube. Tracheal cautery (40/60 watts) was performed using a rigid bronchoscopic electrocoagulator. After intervention, the pigs were observed for 3 weeks and bronchoscopy was performed every 7 days. When the cross-sectional area decreased by > 50%, it was confirmed that tracheal stenosis was established. The time for tracheal stenosis was 14 days in the TC group and 7 days in the COI-TC combination group. In the COI group, no stenosis occurred. In the COI-TC group, electrocautery (40 watts) immediately after intubation for >1 h with a cuff pressure of 200 mmHg or more resulted in sufficient tracheal stenosis within 7 days. Moreover, the degree of tracheal stenosis increased in proportion to the cuff pressure and tracheal intubation time. The combined use of cuff overpressure and electrocautery helped to establish tracheal stenosis in pigs rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.