Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877478›Full record

ReviewNanoscale research letters2021

An Overview on Recent Progress of Metal Oxide/Graphene/CNTs-Based Nanobiosensors.

Ahmet Aykaç, Hazal Gergeroglu, Büşra Beşli, Emine Özge Akkaş, Ahmet Yavaş, Saadet Güler, Fethullah Güneş, Mustafa Erol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale research letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RSC advances · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmet AykaçDepartment of Engineering Sciences, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey. ahmet.aykac@ikcu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-2813
Hazal GergerogluDepartment of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering, Dokuz Eylul University, 35390, Izmir, Turkey.
Büşra BeşliDepartment of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey.
Emine Özge AkkaşDepartment of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey.
Ahmet YavaşDepartment of Material Science and Engineering, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey.
Saadet GülerDepartment of Material Science and Engineering, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey.
Fethullah GüneşDepartment of Material Science and Engineering, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620, Izmir, Turkey.
Mustafa ErolDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, 35390, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobiosensors are convenient, practical, and sensitive analyzers that detect chemical and biological agents and convert the results into meaningful data between a biologically active molecule and a recognition element immobilized on the surface of the signal transducer by a physicochemical detector. Due to their fast, accurate and reliable operating characteristics, nanobiosensors are widely used in clinical and nonclinical applications, bedside testing, medical textile industry, environmental monitoring, food safety, etc. They play an important role in such critical applications. Therefore, the design of the biosensing interface is essential in determining the performance of the nanobiosensor. The unique chemical and physical properties of nanomaterials have paved the way for new and improved sensing devices in biosensors. The growing demand for devices with improved sensing and selectivity capability, short response time, lower limit of detection, and low cost causes novel investigations on nanobiomaterials to be used as biosensor scaffolds. Among all other nanomaterials, studies on developing nanobiosensors based on metal oxide nanostructures, graphene and its derivatives, carbon nanotubes, and the widespread use of these nanomaterials as a hybrid structure have recently attracted attention. Nanohybrid structures created by combining these nanostructures will directly meet the future biosensors' needs with their high electrocatalytic activities. This review addressed the recent developments on these nanomaterials and their derivatives, and their use as biosensor scaffolds. We reviewed these popular nanomaterials by evaluating them with comparative studies, tables, and charts.

Indexed as

Carbon nanotubesGrapheneMetal oxidesNanobiosensorsNanohybrids biosensor scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID33877478
PMCPMC8056378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.