Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877462›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2021

High-frequency ultrasound in clinical dermatology: a review.

Jack Levy, Devon L Barrett, Nile Harris, Jiwoong Jason Jeong, Xiaofeng Yang, Suephy C Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. High-frequency ultrasound accuracy in preoperative cutaneous melanoma assessment: A meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Site-Specific Characterization and Quantification of Facial Corticosteroid Addiction Dermatitis: A Multimodal Nomogram Integrating High-Frequency Ultrasonography and Transepidermal Water Loss.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Solid Hydrogel Couplants for Skin Superficial Blood Flow Imaging With Super-Resolution Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Deep Learning-Based Skin Lesion Classification: A CNN Approach on High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack LevyDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Devon L BarrettDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-1627
Nile HarrisDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jiwoong Jason JeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-9443
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Suephy C ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinic, 40 Duke Medicine Cir, Clinic 3K, Durham, NC, 27710-4000, USA. suephy.chen@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-7380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound was first introduced in clinical dermatology in 1979. Since that time, ultrasound technology has continued to develop along with its popularity and utility. Today, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), or ultrasound using a frequency of at least 10 megahertz (MHz), allows for high-resolution imaging of the skin from the stratum corneum to the deep fascia. This non-invasive and easy-to-interpret tool allows physicians to assess skin findings in real-time, enabling enhanced diagnostic, management, and surgical capabilities. In this review, we discuss how HFUS fits into the landscape of skin imaging. We provide a brief history of its introduction to dermatology, explain key principles of ultrasonography, and review its use in characterizing normal skin, common neoplasms of the skin, dermatologic diseases and cosmetic dermatology.

conclusionAs frequency advancements in ultrasonography continue, the broad applications of this imaging modality will continue to grow. HFUS is a fast, safe and readily available tool that can aid in diagnosing, monitoring and treating dermatologic conditions by providing more objective assessment measures.

Indexed as

DermatologyDiagnostic imagingHigh-frequency ultrasoundUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33877462
PMCPMC8058126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.