Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877438›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Prophylactic mesh placement at index permanent end colostomy creation to prevent parastomal hernia-an updated meta-analysis.

Shaheel M Sahebally, Titus Z Lim, Alisha A Azmir, Cu Tai Lu, Mark Doudle, Arun Naik, Gregory Nolan, Michael Von Papen

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of prophylactic stoma mesh is a risk factor for developing rectus abdominis muscle atrophy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaheel M SaheballyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia. sahebalm@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-2830
Titus Z LimDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Alisha A AzmirDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Cu Tai LuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Mark DoudleDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Arun NaikDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Gregory NolanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Michael Von PapenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Gold Coast Hospital · AURoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDebate persists regarding the efficacy of prophylactic mesh insertion (PMI) at index permanent stoma creation to reduce the rate of parastomal hernia (PSH). This meta-analysis aimed to appraise all the latest evidence from newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PMI for PSH prevention.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles from inception until November 2020. All RCTs that reported on PMI at end colostomy creation with ≥ 12 months follow-up were included. The primary objective was the rate of clinical and radiological PSH while secondary objectives included number of PSH requiring repair and stoma (or mesh)-related complications. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Sensitivity analyses were also performed.

resultsEleven RCTs were included capturing 1097 patients. The mean (SD) age was 67.9 (±9.4) years. On random effects analysis, prophylactic mesh appeared to reduce the rate of both clinical (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.61, p = 0.002) and radiological (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.65, p = 0.0002) PSH. However, there was no difference in number of PSH requiring repair or stoma-related complications. On sensitivity analysis, when focusing on low-risk of bias studies, the benefit of prophylactic mesh in the retrorectus space was lost for both clinical (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.51, p = 0.89) and radiological PSH (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.18, p = 0.20).

conclusionPMI may reduce the rate of subsequent PSH. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings and to establish the optimal mesh position and shape before definite recommendations can be made.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaSurgical StomasAgedColostomyHumansMiddle AgedSurgical MeshColostomyHerniaMeshParastomalPreventionProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID33877438
OpenAlexW3156318390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.