Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877417›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating mid-course responders to chemotherapy for long-bone osteosarcoma compared to the histologic response: an update.

Céline Habre, Alexia Dabadie, Anderson D Loundou, Jean-Bruno Banos, Catherine Desvignes, Harmony Pico, Audrey Aschero, Nathalie Colavolpe, Charlotte Seiler, Corinne Bouvier and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Céline HabreDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France. celine.habre@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2853-4349
Alexia DabadieDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Anderson D LoundouDivision of Statistics and Methodology for Clinical Research, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Jean-Bruno BanosDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Catherine DesvignesDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Harmony PicoDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Audrey AscheroDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Nathalie ColavolpeDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Charlotte SeilerDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Corinne BouvierAnatomopathology Laboratory, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Emilie PeltierDivision of Pediatric Radiology and Prenatal Imaging, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Jean-Claude GentetDivision of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Christiane BauninDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Pascal AuquierDivision of Statistics and Methodology for Clinical Research, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Philippe PetitDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264 Rue Sainte Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Hôpital de la Timone · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been described to correlate with tumoural necrosis in response to preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma.

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of DWI in evaluating the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the mid-course treatment of long-bone osteosarcoma and in predicting survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective single-centre study over a continuous period of 11 years. Consecutive patients younger than 20 years treated with a neoadjuvant regimen for peripheral conventional osteosarcoma were eligible for inclusion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI was performed at diagnosis, and mid- and end-course chemotherapy with mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) calculated at each time point. A percentage less than or equal to 10% of the viable residual tissue at the histological analysis of the surgical specimen was defined as a good responder to chemotherapy. Survival comparisons were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariate analyses with ADC change were performed by Cox modelling. This is an expansion and update of our previous work.

resultsTwenty-six patients between the ages of 4.8 and 19.6 years were included, of whom 14 were good responders. At mid-course chemotherapy, good responders had significantly higher mean ADC values (P=0.046) and a higher increase in ADC (P=0.015) than poor responders. The ADC change from diagnosis to mid-course MRI did not appear to be a prognosticator of survival and did not impact survival rates of both groups.

conclusionDWI at mid-course preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma should be considered to evaluate the degree of histological necrosis and to predict survival. The anticipation of a response to neoadjuvant treatment by DWI may have potential implications on preoperative management.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBone neoplasmChildrenDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingOsteosarcomaTherapeutic response

Identifiers

PMID33877417
PMCPMC8363524
OpenAlexW3156572548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.