Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877400›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Optimal administration of bronchodilators with valved holding chambers in preschool children: a review of literature.

Péter Csonka, Terhi Tapiainen, Mika J Mäkelä, Lauri Lehtimäki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06201156 (Comparison of Pulmonary Index Score After Treatment With Salbutamol Through Nebulizers vs Metered-Dose Inhalers With Spacer Device For Treatment Of Childhood Wheeze), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06201156 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pulmonary Index Score After Treatment With Salbutamol Through Nebulizers vs Metered-Dose Inhalers With Spacer Device For Treatment Of Childhood Wheeze

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhyber Teaching HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled160ConditionsChildhood Asthma With Acute ExacerbationArmsMetered Dose Inhaler With Spacer Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Péter CsonkaCentre for Child Health Research, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Kalevantie 4, 33014 Tampereen yliopisto, Tampere, Finland. peter.csonka@terveystalo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0819-7875
Terhi TapiainenDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oulu University Hospital and PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mika J MäkeläSkin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lauri LehtimäkiAllergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FIOulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to synthesize the published literature on factors that potentially affect the delivery of bronchodilators using valved holding chambers (VHC) in preschool children. We also aimed to identify those attributes that are not yet incorporated or clearly stated in the guidelines and those topics that are still lacking sufficient data. There is strong evidence supporting several recommendations in current guidelines. Based on present knowledge, bronchodilators should be delivered by VHC administering each puff separately. Face mask should be omitted as soon as the child can hold the mouthpiece of the VHC tightly between the lips and teeth. Based on the review, we suggest adding a specific note to current guidelines about the effect of chamber volume and the impact of co-operation during drug administration. Calming the child and securing a tight face-to-mask seal is critical for successful drug delivery. There is not enough evidence to make specific recommendations on the most reliable VHC and face mask for children. There is an urgent need for studies that evaluate and compare the effectiveness of VHCs in various clinical settings in wide age-groups and respiratory patterns. In addition, there is insufficient data on ideal chamber volume, material, and effective antistatic treatment. What is Known: • Valved holding chambers (VHC) should not be considered interchangeable when used with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). • Drug delivery is influenced by VHC volume, aerodynamic and electrostatic properties; mask fit; respiratory pattern and co-operation during inhalation; and the number of puffs actuated. What is New: • The impact of co-operation, VHC volume, and good mask-to-face fit during drug inhalation is not stressed enough in the guidelines. • Studies are urgently needed to evaluate the effectiveness of different VHCs in various clinical settings focusing on VHC electrostatic properties, respiratory patters, face masks, and ideal pMDI+VHC combinations.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsInhalation SpacersAdministration, InhalationAerosolsChild, PreschoolEquipment DesignHumansMetered Dose InhalersAerosolsBronchodilator AgentsAcuteAsthmaBronchodilatorsDrug deliveryEmergency treatmentGuidelinesInhalation therapyManagementPreschool childrenSpacerValved holding chambersWheezing

Identifiers

PMID33877400
PMCPMC8055476
OpenAlexW3155443223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.