Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877392›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021

The PanSurg-PREDICT Study: Endocrine Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

K Van Den Heede, S Chidambaram, J Winter Beatty, N Chander, S Markar, N S Tolley, F F Palazzo, J K Kinross, A N Di Marco, PanSurg Collaborative and the PREDICT-Endocrine Collaborative

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Safe Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current obesity reports · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K Van Den HeedeDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0HS, UK. klaasvandenheede@hotmail.com.
S ChidambaramDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
J Winter BeattyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
N ChanderDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0HS, UK.
S MarkarDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
N S TolleyDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0HS, UK.
F F PalazzoDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0HS, UK.
J K KinrossDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
A N Di MarcoDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0HS, UK.
PanSurg Collaborative and the PREDICT-Endocrine Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have continued to present with endocrine (surgical) pathology in an environment depleted of resources. This study investigated how the pandemic affected endocrine surgery practice.

methodsPanSurg-PREDICT is an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of emergency and elective surgical patients in secondary/tertiary care during the pandemic. PREDICT-Endocrine collected endocrine-specific data alongside demographics, COVID-19 and outcome data from 11-3-2020 to 13-9-2020.

resultsA total of 380 endocrine surgery patients (19 centres, 12 countries) were analysed (224 thyroidectomies, 116 parathyroidectomies, 40 adrenalectomies). Ninety-seven percent were elective, and 63% needed surgery within 4 weeks. Eight percent were initially deferred but had surgery during the pandemic; less than 1% percent was deferred for more than 6 months. Decision-making was affected by capacity, COVID-19 status or the pandemic in 17%, 5% and 7% of cases. Indication was cancer/worrying lesion in 61% of thyroidectomies and 73% of adrenalectomies and calcium 2.80 mmol/l or greater in 50% of parathyroidectomies. COVID-19 status was unknown at presentation in 92% and remained unknown before surgery in 30%. Two-thirds were asked to self-isolate before surgery. There was one COVID-19-related ICU admission and no mortalities. Consultant-delivered care occurred in a majority (anaesthetist 96%, primary surgeon 76%). Post-operative vocal cord check was reported in only 14% of neck endocrine operations. Both of these observations are likely to reflect modification of practice due to the pandemic.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected endocrine surgical decision-making, case mix and personnel delivering care. Significant variation was seen in COVID-19 risk mitigation measures. COVID-19-related complications were uncommon. This analysis demonstrates the safety of endocrine surgery during this pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.