Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877385›Full record

SynthesisCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated pericardial disease: a systematic review of case reports.

Alessandro Inno, Nicola Maurea, Giulio Metro, Andreina Carbone, Antonio Russo, Stefania Gori

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro InnoOncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy. alessandro.inno@sacrocuore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-6908
Nicola MaureaDivisione di Cardiologia, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Giulio MetroOncologia Medica, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Andreina CarboneDivisione di Cardiologia, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Antonio RussoOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche E Stomatologiche, Policlinico Universitario "A. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.
Stefania GoriOncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Perugia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be complicated by cardiovascular toxicity, including pericardial disease. To date, no prospective studies specifically investigated the optimal treatment of ICI-associated pericardial disease, and the available evidence is based on case reports and series only. We performed a systematic review of case reports and series including 20 publications for a total of 28 cases of ICI-associated pericardial disease. In this review, pericardial disease was reversible in the majority of cases (75%), although 2 deaths were reported. The majority of cases were life-threatening (G4, 53.6%) or severe (G3, 21.4%), requiring pericardiocentesis. Higher rates of improvement were associated with administration of corticosteroids (86.7% vs 61.5%), presence of other immune-related adverse events (90.9% vs. 64.7%), and non-malignant effusions (86.7% vs 42.8%). ICIs were discontinued in the majority of cases and then restarted in 7 patients with no recurrence of pericardial disease. Based on these results, ICI-associated G3-G4 pericardial disease as well as G2 pericardial disease with moderate-severe effusion should be treated with ICIs discontinuation and high-dose steroids, also performing pericardiocentesis, pericardial drainage or pericardial window in case of cardiac tamponade. For G2 with small effusion or G1 pericardial disease, ICIs might be continued and colchicine or NSAIDs could be considered. For patients requiring ICIs discontinuation, a rechallenge with ICIs seems to be feasible after resolution or meaningful improvement of pericardial disease.

Indexed as

HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPericardial EffusionImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCardiac tamponadeCardiotoxicityImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPericardial effusionPericarditisRechallenge

Identifiers

PMID33877385
PMCPMC10992244
OpenAlexW3155768635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.