Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877329›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Preferential CEBP binding to T:G mismatches and increased C-to-T human somatic mutations.

Jie Yang, John R Horton, Kadir C Akdemir, Jia Li, Yun Huang, Janani Kumar, Robert M Blumenthal, Xing Zhang, Xiaodong Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Individuals with intellectual disability have an increased burden ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie YangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
John R HortonDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Kadir C AkdemirDepartments of Genomic Medicine and Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jia LiCenter for Epigenetics & Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yun HuangCenter for Epigenetics & Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-9168
Janani KumarDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Robert M BlumenthalDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, and Program in Bioinformatics, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Xing ZhangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xiaodong ChengDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6967-6362
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USPrevention Institute · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

Epigenetic regulations of DNA and histone methylation and deMethylation: Structures and MechanismsR35GM134744 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Xiaodong Cheng · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
TET-mediated epigenetic regulation in cardiac development.R01HL134780 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HUANG, YUN · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Role of TET dioxygenase associated immune mechanisms in cardiac injury and repairR01HL146852 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HUANG, YUN · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
Molecular toolkit for single-cell oxi-mC analysisR21GM138824 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HUANG, YUN · 2020 to 2021
$432k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134780NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146852NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM138824NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA cytosine methylation in mammals modulates gene expression and chromatin accessibility. It also impacts mutation rates, via spontaneous oxidative deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to thymine. In most cases the resulting T:G mismatches are repaired, following T excision by one of the thymine DNA glycosylases, TDG or MBD4. We found that C-to-T mutations are enriched in the binding sites of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (CEBP). Within a CEBP site, the presence of a T:G mismatch increased CEBPβ binding affinity by a factor of >60 relative to the normal C:G base pair. This enhanced binding to a mismatch inhibits its repair by both TDG and MBD4 in vitro. Furthermore, repair of the deamination product of unmethylated cytosine, which yields a U:G DNA mismatch that is normally repaired via uracil DNA glycosylase, is also inhibited by CEBPβ binding. Passage of a replication fork over either a T:G or U:G mismatch, before repair can occur, results in a C-to-T mutation in one of the daughter duplexes. Our study thus provides a plausible mechanism for accumulation of C-to-T human somatic mutations.

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchBinding SitesCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCytosineDNADNA RepairGuanineHumansMutationProtein BindingProtein DomainsThymineCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCytosineDNAGuanineThymine

Identifiers

PMID33877329
PMCPMC8136768
OpenAlexW3154890286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.