Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877327›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Measuring nonhomologous end-joining, homologous recombination and alternative end-joining simultaneously at an endogenous locus in any transfectable human cell.

Suleman S Hussain, Rahul Majumdar, Grace M Moore, Himanshi Narang, Erika S Buechelmaier, Maximilian J Bazil, Pavithran T Ravindran, Jonathan E Leeman, Yi Li, Manisha Jalan and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Suleman S HussainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Rahul MajumdarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Grace M MooreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Himanshi NarangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Erika S BuechelmaierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Maximilian J BazilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Pavithran T RavindranPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Jonathan E LeemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02189, USA.
Yi LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Manisha JalanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kyrie S AndersonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Andrea FarinaIntegrated Genomics Operations, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Rekha SoniIntegrated Genomics Operations, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Neeman MohibullahIntegrated Genomics Operations, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Edin HamzicBiocomputix, Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Xiaoqing Rong-MullinsDepartment of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Christopher SifuentesTakara Bio USA, Inc., Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.
Rama R DamerlaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Agnes VialeIntegrated Genomics Operations, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Daniel S HigginsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-7454
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USPrinceton University · USTakara (United States) · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Comprehensive breakpoint analyses for simultaneous quantification of all DNA double strand break repair pathwaysR33CA236670 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HIGGINSON, DANIEL · 2020 to 2020
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R33 CA236670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double strand break (DSB) repair primarily occurs through 3 pathways: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), alternative end-joining (Alt-EJ), and homologous recombination (HR). Typical methods to measure pathway usage include integrated cassette reporter assays or visualization of DNA damage induced nuclear foci. It is now well understood that repair of Cas9-induced breaks also involves NHEJ, Alt-EJ, and HR pathways, providing a new format to measure pathway usage. Here, we have developed a simple Cas9-based system with validated repair outcomes that accurately represent each pathway and then converted it to a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) readout, thus obviating the need for Next Generation Sequencing and bioinformatic analysis with the goal to make Cas9-based system accessible to more laboratories. The assay system has reproduced several important insights. First, absence of the key Alt-EJ factor Pol θ only abrogates ∼50% of total Alt-EJ. Second, single-strand templated repair (SSTR) requires BRCA1 and MRE11 activity, but not BRCA2, establishing that SSTR commonly used in genome editing is not conventional HR. Third, BRCA1 promotes Alt-EJ usage at two-ended DSBs in contrast to BRCA2. This assay can be used in any system, which permits Cas9 delivery and, importantly, allows rapid genotype-to-phenotype correlation in isogenic cell line pairs.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairPolymerase Chain ReactionRecombinational DNA RepairBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCell LineCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenetic LociHumansTransfectionBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCRISPR-Associated Protein 9

Identifiers

PMID33877327
PMCPMC8287935
OpenAlexW3155030940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.