Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877322›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

Invited Commentary: New Directions in Machine Learning Analyses of Administrative Data to Prevent Suicide-Related Behaviors.

Robert M Bossarte, Chris J Kennedy, Alex Luedtke, Matthew K Nock, Jordan W Smoller, Cara Stokes, Ronald C Kessler

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert M Bossarte
Chris J Kennedy
Alex Luedtke
Matthew K Nock
Jordan W Smoller
Cara Stokes
Ronald C Kessler

Funding

Leveraging EHR data to evaluate key treatment decisions to prevent suicide-related behaviorsR01MH121478 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KESSLER, RONALD C · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This issue contains a thoughtful report by Gradus et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(12):2517-2527) on a machine learning analysis of administrative variables to predict suicide attempts over 2 decades throughout Denmark. This is one of numerous recent studies that document strong concentration of risk of suicide-related behaviors among patients with high scores on machine learning models. The clear exposition of Gradus et al. provides an opportunity to review major challenges in developing, interpreting, and using such models: defining appropriate controls and time horizons, selecting comprehensive predictors, dealing with imbalanced outcomes, choosing classifiers, tuning hyperparameters, evaluating predictor variable importance, and evaluating operating characteristics. We close by calling for machine-learning research into suicide-related behaviors to move beyond merely demonstrating significant prediction-this is by now well-established-and to focus instead on using such models to target specific preventive interventions and to develop individualized treatment rules that can be used to help guide clinical decisions to address the growing problems of suicide attempts, suicide deaths, and other injuries and deaths in the same spectrum.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedHumansMachine Learningmachine learningpredictionsuicide

Identifiers

PMID33877322
PMCPMC8796802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.