Folic Acid and Infant Allergy: Avoiding Rash Judgments.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid.Scientific reports · 2023
   Trial
2. Biological, dietetic and pharmacological properties of vitamin BNPJ science of food · 2025
   Review
3. Overview of Neural Tube Defects: Gene-Environment Interactions, Preventative Approaches and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Maternal Late-Pregnancy Serum Unmetabolized Folic Acid Concentrations Are Not Associated with Infant Allergic Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as