Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33877257›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2021

Identification and characterization of repetitive DNA in the genus Didelphis Linnaeus, 1758 (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) and the use of satellite DNAs as phylogenetic markers.

Cayo Augusto Rocha Dias, Gustavo C S Kuhn, Marta Svartman, José Eustáquio Dos Santos Júnior, Fabrício Rodrigues Santos, Christian Miguel Pinto, Fernando Araújo Perini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Satellite DNAs in Drosophila koepferae (repleta group) reveal patterns of origin, chromosomal organization, transcription, and turnover in the buzzatii cluster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cayo Augusto Rocha DiasUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Evolução de Mamíferos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Gustavo C S KuhnUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-7964
Marta SvartmanUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Citogenômica Evolutiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
José Eustáquio Dos Santos JúniorUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Evolução Molecular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-3751
Fabrício Rodrigues SantosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Evolução Molecular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Christian Miguel PintoEscuela Politécnica Nacional, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biologia, Quito, Ecuador.
Fernando Araújo PeriniUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Evolução de Mamíferos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRNational Polytechnic School · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Didelphis species have been shown to exhibit very conservative karyotypes, which mainly differ in their constitutive heterochromatin, known to be mostly composed by repetitive DNAs. In this study, we used genome skimming data combined with computational pipelines to identify the most abundant repetitive DNA families of Lutreolina crassicaudata and all six Didelphis species. We found that transposable elements (TEs), particularly LINE-1, endogenous retroviruses, and SINEs, are the most abundant mobile elements in the studied species. Despite overall similar TE proportions, we report that species of the D. albiventris group consistently present a less diverse TE composition and smaller proportions of LINEs and LTRs in their genomes than other studied species. We also identified four new putative satDNAs (sat206, sat907, sat1430 and sat2324) in the genomes of Didelphis species, which show differences in abundance and nucleotide composition. Phylogenies based on satDNA sequences showed well supported relationships at the species (sat1430) and groups of species (sat206) level, recovering topologies congruent with previous studies. Our study is one of the first attempts to present a characterization of the most abundant families of repetitive DNAs of Lutreolina and Didelphis species providing insights into the repetitive DNA composition in the genome landscape of American marsupials.

Identifiers

PMID33877257
PMCPMC8056902
OpenAlexW3155718921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.