ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2021
Enhancement of in vivo cardiac photoacoustic signal specificity using spatiotemporal singular value decomposition.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical theranostics in ischemic heart disease: from molecular insights to clinical translation.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Review
- Lumen segmentation using a Mask R-CNN in carotid arteries with stenotic atherosclerotic plaque.Ultrasonics · 2024Article
- Photoacoustic imaging on its way toward clinical utility: a tutorial review focusing on practical application in medicine.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Review
- In Vivo Longitudinal Monitoring of Cardiac Remodeling in Murine Ischemia Models With Adaptive Bayesian Regularized Cardiac Strain Imaging: Validation Against Histology.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal singular value decomposition for denoising in photoacoustic imaging with a low-energy excitation light source.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
significancePhotoacoustic imaging (PAI) can be used to infer molecular information about myocardial health non-invasively in vivo using optical excitation at ultrasonic spatial resolution. For clinical and preclinical linear array imaging systems, conventional delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is typically used. However, DAS cardiac PA images are prone to artifacts such as diffuse quasi-static clutter with temporally varying noise-reducing myocardial signal specificity. Typically, multiple frame averaging schemes are utilized to improve the quality of cardiac PAI, which affects the spatial and temporal resolution and reduces sensitivity to subtle PA signal variation. Furthermore, frame averaging might corrupt myocardial oxygen saturation quantification due to the presence of natural cardiac wall motion. In this paper, a spatiotemporal singular value decomposition (SVD) processing algorithm is proposed to reduce DAS PAI artifacts and subsequent enhancement of myocardial signal specificity.
aimDemonstrate enhancement of PA signals from myocardial tissue compared to surrounding tissues and blood inside the left-ventricular (LV) chamber using spatiotemporal SVD processing with electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiratory signal (ECG-R) gated in vivo murine cardiac PAI. APPROACH: In vivo murine cardiac PAI was performed by collecting single wavelength (850 nm) photoacoustic channel data on eight healthy mice. A three-dimensional (3D) volume of complex PAI data over a cardiac cycle was reconstructed using a custom ECG-R gating algorithm and DAS beamforming. Spatiotemporal SVD was applied on a two-dimensional Casorati matrix generated using the 3D volume of PAI data. The singular value spectrum (SVS) was then filtered to remove contributions from diffuse quasi-static clutter and random noise. Finally, SVD processed beamformed images were derived using filtered SVS and inverse SVD computations.
resultsQualitative comparison with DAS and minimum variance (MV) beamforming shows that SVD processed images had better myocardial signal specificity, contrast, and target detectability. DAS, MV, and SVD images were quantitatively evaluated by calculating contrast ratio (CR), generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Quantitative evaluations were done at three cardiac time points (during systole, at end-systole (ES), and during diastole) identified from co-registered ultrasound M-Mode image. Mean CR, gCNR, and SNR values of SVD images at ES were 245, 115.15, and 258.17 times higher than DAS images with statistical significance evaluated with one-way analysis of variance.
conclusionsOur results suggest that significantly better-quality images can be realized using spatiotemporal SVD processing for in vivo murine cardiac PAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.