ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2021
Multi-Dimensional Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hollow Glass Microspheres (HGMs): Synthesis, Characterization, and Processes in Biomedical Applications-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hybrid Multiphoton Lithography Scaffolds for Nanoscale Mechanobiological Assessment in Microscale Bone Models.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Barriers Implementing Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Bone Scaffolds in Australia: A Scoping Review.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Review
- Vat Photopolymerization of Smart Polymers for Biomedical Applications.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Review
- Beyond natural silk: Bioengineered silk fibroin for bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Combined Effects of Dual-Scale Modified Surface with Micro- and Nanostructures on the Cellular Biocompatibility, Osteoinduction, and Antibacterial Properties of Titanium Implants.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Stimulus-responsive smart bioactive glass composites for repair of complex tissue defects.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Advances in 3D-Printed scaffolds for bone defect repair: material strategies and synergistic functional performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A Futuristic Development in 3D Printing Technique Using Nanomaterials with a Step Toward 4D Printing.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Review
- Highly oriented hydrogels for tissue regeneration: design strategies, cellular mechanisms, and biomedical applications.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Effects of Space Dimensionality within Scaffold for Bone Regeneration with Large and Oriented Blood Vessels.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Medical-Grade Poly(Lactic Acid)/Hydroxyapatite Composite Films: Thermal and In Vitro Degradation Properties.Polymers · 2023Article
- Influence of Process Parameters on the Characteristics of Additively Manufactured Parts Made from Advanced Biopolymers.Polymers · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Silk Fibroin as a Persuasive Biomaterial for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Chitosan-vancomycin hydrogel incorporated bone repair scaffold based on staggered orthogonal structure: a viable dually controlled drug delivery system.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Four-Dimensional Printing and Shape Memory Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Tissue Engineering in Neuroscience: Applications and Perspectives.BME frontiers · 2023Review
- Building Osteogenic Microenvironments with a Double-Network Composite Hydrogel for Bone Repair.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The development of 3D printing has significantly advanced the field of bone tissue engineering by enabling the fabrication of scaffolds that faithfully recapitulate desired mechanical properties and architectures. In addition, computer-based manufacturing relying on patient-derived medical images permits the fabrication of customized modules in a patient-specific manner. In addition to conventional 3D fabrication, progress in materials engineering has led to the development of 4D printing, allowing time-sensitive interventions such as programed therapeutics delivery and modulable mechanical features. Therapeutic interventions established via multi-dimensional engineering are expected to enhance the development of personalized treatment in various fields, including bone tissue regeneration. Here, recent studies utilizing 3D printed systems for bone tissue regeneration are summarized and advances in 4D printed systems are highlighted. Challenges and perspectives for the future development of multi-dimensional printed systems toward personalized bone regeneration are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.