Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33876469›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

Preferences for and acceptability of receiving pharmacogenomic results by mail: A focus group study with a primarily African-American cohort.

Priscilla A Chan, Katie L Lewis, Barbara B Biesecker, Lori H Erby, Grace-Ann Fasaye, Sandra Epps, Leslie G Biesecker, Erin Turbitt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00410241 (ClinSeq), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00410241 active not recruitingnot on this map

ClinSeq: A Large-Scale Medical Sequencing Clinical Research Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)Ran2007Enrolled1,665ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priscilla A ChanMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Katie L LewisMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Barbara B BieseckerResearch Triangle Institute, Washington DC, USA.
Lori H ErbyMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Grace-Ann FasayeGenetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sandra EppsMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leslie G BieseckerMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Erin TurbittUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-9702

Funding

Genomic Ascertainment - Molecular and Genetic AspectsZIAHG200359 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2009 to 2025
$19.7M
Genomic Ascertainment - Clinical and Behavioral AspectsZIAHG200387 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2013 to 2025
$15.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200359NHGRI NIH HHS HG200359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genetic counseling is traditionally done through in-person, one-on-one visits, workforce shortages call for efficient result return mechanisms. Studies have shown that telephone and in-person return of cancer genetic results are equivalent for patient outcomes. Few studies have been conducted with other modes, result types or racially diverse participants. This study explored participants' perspectives on receiving pharmacogenomic results by mail. Two experienced moderators facilitated six focus groups with 49 individuals who self-identified primarily as African-American and consented to participate in a genome sequencing cohort study. Participants were given a hypothetical pharmacogenomic result report (positive for c.521T>C in SLCO1B1). An accompanying letter explained that the result was associated with statin intolerance along with a recommendation to share it with one's doctor and immediate relatives. Participants reacted to the idea of receiving this type of result by mail, discussing whether the letter's information was sufficient and what they predicted they would do with the result. Two researchers coded the focus group transcripts and identified themes. Many participants thought that it was appropriate to receive the result through the mail, but some suggested a phone call alerting the recipient to the letter. Others emphasized that although a letter was acceptable for disclosing pharmacogenomic results, it would be insufficient for what they perceived as life-threatening results. Most participants found the content sufficient. Some participants suggested resources about statin intolerance and warning signs be added. Most claimed they would share the result with their doctor, yet few participants offered they would share the result with their relatives. This exploratory study advances the evidence that African-American research participants are receptive to return of certain genetic results by approaches that do not involve direct contact with a genetic counselor and intend to share results with providers. ClinSeq: A Large-Scale Medical Sequencing Clinical Research Pilot Study (NCT00410241).

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanPharmacogeneticsCohort StudiesFocus GroupsHumansLiver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1Pilot ProjectsPostal ServiceLiver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1SLCO1B1 protein, humanAfrican-Americanscommunicationgenetic counselingpharmacogenomicsscalable

Identifiers

PMID33876469
PMCPMC9026736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.